The difference here is that excusable homicide is when someone never intended to kill and justifiable homicide there was the intent to kill but it was justifiable. When one proves a homicide has been committed then it is the responsibility of the investigator to identify the victim. This can be done most easily by asking family and friends or by simply finding identification on the victim. There are also several other ways that one can identify a victim these included but are not limited to; fingerprints, DNA, dental and skeletal studies, clothing and laundry marks, and missing persons files. Several good indicators of a homicide are no GSR or gun shot residue on victim, angle and location that rules out self infliction, shot through clothing, and no weapon present.
Homicide is murder but not all homicides are illegal some are considered justified homicide an example of justified homicide is when its done as an act of self defense. Homicide is a heinous crime that is very serious and will result in going to jail for a long time.This is what homicide is. Scenario Two: What is the most serious offense Lori can be convicted of? Explain. Lori committed a controversial crime that many people believe was the right call to make but a crime is a crime you can’t break the law just because you don't like it and in this paragraph i will explain to you what law Lori will most likely be charged for.
Retributivism is an unbiased and impartial response to a perpetrator that has wronged another. Revenge usually inflicts harm greater in severity than the initial crime whereas retribution exacts proportional punishment. Objection 2: Even if the murderer deserves to die the state does not have special authority to take the life of another human being. “‘Vengeance is mine, I will repay,’ says the Lord” (Duet. 32:35 & Romans
Which seems nearly impossible. Everyone with a history of a criminal record should be prohibited from owning a gun no matter what the crime is. I feel like it’s fair and even though everyone’s criminal record might not be as bad as someone else’s I still think it would be for the best. I still highly doubt that doing a background check on people would reduce the violence because getting a gun these days is very easy. People can literally get them from anywhere.
However, even she had to admit that these special laws won't deter the criminals who practice these violent acts. Murder is murder and regardless of motive if the intent to kill exist, no law is going to prevent
It would give the law enforcement personnel a bad name or rap because he or she broke the policy. The victim would not feel justice had been served if the suspect walked. The precinct where the evidence was held may look incompetent because they cannot follow procedures, which could end up with an internal investigation. The only person that would be happy would be the person that the evidence was against. The first person to handle the weapon would initial or write an identifying number on the evidence.
Alas, you are a devout gun control supporter and do not have any means of which to defend yourself from such an attack. How can this be that a criminal is carrying a gun when the new gun control laws are in effect? The answer is quite simple: Criminals do not follow the law! Gun control is not an effective means of curbing gun-related violence. The only people that benefit from gun control are the criminal element.
They tend to land on their feet. They are cool under crisis. Even if they commit murder by accident, they are not the types of people who will seem agitated or sad. Rather, they think strategically, realizing that they must come up with a story quickly in order to divert attention away from themselves. They mislead police, stage crime scenes and destroy evidence.
Real justice requires people to suffer for what they did and to suffer in a way that is appropriate for the crime. For example, for murder they should be murdered in the same way. By executing convicted murderers they won’t have a chance of doing the same to someone else. The very small chance of executing the wrong person is balanced by the benefits to society of putting off other murders who were thinking about doing the same. Also, DNA testing and other methods of crime scene science can now be so precise and can eliminate any uncertainty to whether someone is guilty or not.
(Bureau of Justice Statistics) If the justice system fails then any crime can be committed such as rape, burglary, murder, driving under the influence, etc. Criminals would walk away freely with no type of punishment and think that it is okay to keep on committing crime and making their communities unsafe. In our justice