Why Did the Royalists Lose the First Civil War?

779 Words4 Pages
The Royalists lost the first Civil War due to the weaknesses of Charles and more importantly the strengths of Parliament. An example of this, is Parliaments occupation over London where the core of the Puritan network and England's main industry was held. All of which Charles failed to capture due to his lack of military coordination. Parliament were also militarily strong due to their control of the Navy and the New Model Army in 1645. In terms of Royalist weaknesses, Charles and his personality definitely proved to be one of the most visible. The kings speech defect burdened his communication skills, critical for being a strong leader. Charles' indecisive and stubborn nature meant that he was unwilling to compromise, resulting in the failure to achieve loyalty from his own army combined with Charles' religious orientation made life hard for the Royalists from the start of the first Civil War. Early military failures played another key role in the Royalist defeat for example on the 5th September 1642 when Charles left London to prepare for the first battle of Edgehill. Moreover the battle ended in stalemate and the Royalists progressed on to London. However the Royalists were halted at Turnham Green by Parliamentarian resistance, me they could coordinate their forces. Instead of launching an attack on London, the Royalists were fell back to Oxford because the support from the Earl of Newcastle did not transpire as he failed to show up. Following several losses, for example at Marston Moor in 1644 and Naseby in 1645, Charles was militarily destroyed and therefore played a key role in the loss of the first Civil War. However, there were some successes where the military was concerned, because not only did the Royalists occupy Oxford which is geographically strong, they also had control over Bristol which was a valuable port. However, within these bases,
Open Document