The researcher considers that it can only be done by more focusing on the method to which Husserl asserted in knowing the essence of things. With this matter, the researcher anticipates that this paper will serve as a gadfly of those people who are already enclosed by the presuppositions, beliefs, judgments, prejudices, and biases that hinders them of being a pure consciousness. It is now our concern to know and follow the ideas of Husserl in knowing the essence of things. Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenology: a means to arrive the vista of transcendentally purified phenomena. To begin this paper, it is more appropriate to talk first about the method which Husserl fashioned in order for man to get back to the things in themselves, and this method is what he called phenomenological reduction.
Hey. I needed someone to just proof read my essay. Does it prove my point? Do I analyze each quote the right way? Do I write plot instead of analyzing it?
The two writers I included in this paper Andrew Ofstad and Ursula Le Guin have similar and different ideas on how technology can affect literature, but also if reading maybe declining in society. I don't focus so much on if reading is declining; I focus if technology is really detrimental to reading and learning to society. I think it is important to see that reading is important for learning, but technology also has a way for people to read and learn as well. I don't expect you as the reader to agree with my own conclusion, but to decide on your own opinion on the matter after reading my essay. Andrew Ofstad's "America's Decline in Literacy Reading: Grappling with Technology's Effects on the Print of Culture" and Ursula Le Guin's "Staying Awake: Notes on the Alleged Decline of Reading" are both essays that focus on the decline of reading in society.
The following criteria are essential to produce an effective argument Be well informed about your topic. To add to your knowledge of a topic, read thoroughly about it, using legitimate sources. Take notes. Test your thesis. Your thesis, i.e., argument, must have two sides.
While the paper should be argument driven, I am not grading this based on where the arguments are located in the paper (so long as your arrangement is logical and gets the point across to the reader; saving your argument for the very end would not be the best idea). For Act I, I am giving you a seemingly plot-level prompt. Do not be fooled into thinking that I am asking for a simple summary of the events of the play. Your job is to analyze the given scene carefully in order to construct meaningful insights. Go beyond your initial findings.
Your introduction should include a thesis statement that clearly states your decision and gives a brief indication of the reasons for it. In your introduction, you should also include any background information that your reader needs to understand the situation in its proper context. In the body of the essay you should also explain to your reader the reasons for your decision and should dos o in a manner that helps your reader to understand why you made that decision, as well as what your other options were and why you did not choose them. Finally, your conclusion should bring the paper to satisfying closure by reminding your reader of the premise of your paper (i.e. your decision) in a way that does more than simply restate your thesis.
Consider the suggestions below. * the value of truth/ truth and perspective * human needs and relationships * the need for control/ stability * the nature of difference * communication * acceptance Activity Aim: * To develop your understanding of the key ideas/ issues in the novel * To make connections between the key ideas and the techniques and events used to shape your understanding of these ideas The themes below are just a few of many possible suggestions. You might choose to phrase the wording of the theme differently, or to add your own. Theme | Events/ content from the text that develop this theme | Relevant quote | Techniques used to shape/ develop meaning | Conclusions you can draw/ your response to the representation of this theme | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Setting Aim: •To understand how different settings are represented in the novel •To appreciate the distinctive characteristics of setting in the novel The novel is set in two, very different locations.
However,….. | The stages you go through when writing an essay 1. Analyse and interpret your text(s) as an example of fiction/ non-fiction using the relevant tools mentioned above. 2. Pre-writing: Jot down ideas about thesis statement and other important points you want to make in your essay, special expressions you want to use, important quotations from the texts, etc. Help yourself by thinking: “This is what I want to make clear in this essay”, “I also want to
The writer has to avoid appealing to “authorities” who are interesting but who are not experts. Another method for persuasion is using examples. The example should clearly relate to the argument and should be typical enough to support it. Avoiding examples that are not typical enough to support the general statement, it is a good way. To persuade the reader, the writer can use the method predicting the consequence.
The in-class presentation of Balzac’s Pere Goriot emphasized the importance of “intertextuality” to this novel. Balzac’s work has been compared to Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Milton’s Paradise Lost as well as Goetha’s Faust. How does Balzac stage the struggle between good and evil in the conflict between Eugene de Rastignac and Vautrin? Your essay should demonstrate that you have some familiarity with the plot of the novel through Pere Goriot, Part Three, and should briefly discuss at least one canonical work to which Balzac’s novel has been compared. Balzac’s novel shares a lot of characteristics with Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales.