Some cause for concerns can be found in the first writing of the Constitution (the one that will soon be thoroughly discussed) and some lay in more recent Amendments. However, we must not forget that these voices can only be discussed out loud for all opinions to be made on it because of the foresight of those in our past that demanded such rights before approving the Constitution as the foundation of our new government. The Constitution that was written before the ratification debate was adequate in its democracy, but fell short of its goal of creating a government that incorporates all of the citizens views equally and effectively. The Constitution divides the power between the three government
The Constitution is a very strong document and any change to it changes the way everyone in the country can live. It is in Article V of the Constitution that tells the methods for adopting amendments. Amendments can be proposed by 2/3 vote by the house of Congress. Then the amendments must be approved by ¾ the states, and by ¾ of the state legislatures. Which usually is a long and complicated process.
which is one of the sources of the constitution with one of the three rules being that no Parliament is able to bind a future Parliament. This is showing that the UK having an uncodified constitution is as such a strength rather than a weakness because it is able to be changed unlike a codified constitution which will be at least a two thirds majority within the houses of the government. – Clear paragraph, good comparison and focus on the question. Try
The Constitution is relevant because the Constitution undergirds our country, minimal complications have risen with it. And because of the difficulty in creating a whole new document that will be as effective as our beloved Constitution. The Constitution presents the entirety our government is and will ever be. The Constitution explains our branches of government: the executive, the legislative and judicial branches. It establishes the extent to which each individual branch can oversee, as well as the limitations each branch represents.
The principle organ of the US state is to legislate, represent and scrutinise the other, safely separated, branches of the government. First of the three elements in which Congress’s primary role plays is in legislation. The very first article of the Constitution lays out how this is done. Bills initiated by both the President and members of Congress are almost certain to be substantially modified as they go through the legislative process, making it very difficult for the President or any political faction to force through their policy agenda. Congress has been somewhat effective in passing laws such as the PATRIOTIC Act under Bush and the Healthcare Reform Act under Obama both show’s that Congress can legislate when it needs be, especially with a majority in both houses.
Basically, these people view the Constitution as a finished project. This term was coined by Paul Brest in 1981 and he defined originalism as “the familiar approach to constitutional adjudication that accords binding authority to the text of the Constitution or the intentions of its adopters.” The living constitution view means that the Constitution is a “living” document. Such as a living person changes over time, so does the Constitution. These people view the Constitution as an initial framework for governance that sets politics in motion and must be filled out over time through constitutional construction. So the goal of this is to get the government started and keep it going and stable so it can solve future problems of governance.
They wanted to have a system that could be changed when necessary. Self-Government was and still is important because people want to be able to participate in their government and help create laws that are fair to everyone. The third and final basic principle of our constitution is Separation of Powers, also known as Checks and Balances. Checks and balances are a system that allows each branch of a government to amend or veto acts of another branch so as to prevent any one
I believe that the Constitution of the United States has held this country strong for over two hundred years now. I do not agree with the Supreme Courts getting involved and trying to make extreme changes to the Constitution. I feel these men were wise beyond their years and knew what they were doing when they wrote the Constitution. Regardless of the color of these men’s skin, they were taking charge and developing a form of government that would be beneficial for all of mankind. Amendments have already taken place to the Constitution that was necessary.
2. Why is common law important? Common law is important because it keeps agreements and contracts liable and helps regulate our society. It is a body of general rules that applied throughout the entire English realm. Moreover, it became part of the heritage of all nations that were once British colonies, including the United
Cynthia Jones Madison’s Federalists #51 The Federalists papers were written for encouragement of ratification to the Constitution. We learn that Madison says “we are all citizens who need checks and balances throughout the government.” There are three branches of government the executive branch, legislative branch, and the judicial branch that all have separate powers in American government. Madison breaks down how each should be keeping pieces of their power in its place within its constitutional means. One goal was to ensure no branch of government have more power to be tyrannical and violate against right and liberties, so that one branch may not dominate another. When we only had thirteen states, they wanted to become sovereign countries,