Thinking Critical Simulation Discussion Paper

1259 Words6 Pages
Thinking Critical Simulation Discussion Nancy Chavez, Leslie Fay, Renita Livingston, and Brian Moat University of Phoenix MGT/350 January 8, 2012 Brad Walker Thinking Critical Simulation Discussion In any business defining the problem and not just the cause is the correct way to find a solution to take care of the problem. There is always an opportunity to enhance the way organizations handle or prevent issues from coming to the surface. Issues develop on an everyday basis, but the actions taken to resolve issues or how organizations chooses to maintain operations despite of existing issues is what keeps an organization on the right track. It is important for individuals in management take the necessary steps to execute actions that will be most practical as they relate to the goals the organization is seeking to achieve. Time, cost and how it will reflect on the employees are equally important and should be used as guiding principles to ensure the most appropriate actions are enforced. Thinking Tools and Techniques in Simulation Nancy believes that the simulation requires a person to determine with urgency the importance of a problem. Regarding which…show more content…
They are losing some of their employees and customers to a new business. In this simulation there is limited information concerning the issue. Leslie used critical problem solving to analyze the main issue before looking into a solution. Renita states that Credenhill Industry’s allows team members to exercise the decision-making steps that includes identifying problems, connecting the problems to the goals set forth and weigh the options available to resolve issues. Team members are given the opportunity to categorize problems based on their urgency and if they fall under critical and noncritical

More about Thinking Critical Simulation Discussion Paper

Open Document