Many people believe that morality is dependent is religion and morality is based on the religious scholars and holy books. There is no point in morality of God hadn’t set the moral values in the first place. However, some also say that humans only behave morally because they’re scared of God and any punishment to follow. There are several approaches that are taken when attempting to work out the relationship between religion and morality. ‘Is what is pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved?’ In Plato’s Euthyphro dilemma, Plato is asking ‘is x good because God loves it or does God love x because x is good?’ An example of this is murder; is murder wrong because God says it is or is murder wrong because it is wrong morally?
However, as he continues to perform with the patients finds for himself that love is most definitely imperative for humans. Love is one of the main themes of ‘Cosi’. The play suggests many different aspects of love by giving us the different opinions of love from the main characters. Ultimately throughout the play the changed values that Lewis has on love, the faith that Cherry has towards Lewis and the loyalty that Julie displays towards her lover shapes Nowra’s views on love. Love must consist of not
Cosi The particular aspect of love that is the focus of the play is fidelity; the notion of faithfulness, commitment and loyalty. The play explores many aspects of love, the characters present slightly different perspectives, some final about their positions from the start and others change or develop differing perspectives. This concept is explored through the individual characters Lucy and Lewis. Using the technique of characterisation, Nowra is able to present the idea of ‘free love’ negatively to the audience through the character Lucy. Who strongly endorses the idea that love is an indulgence, “After bread, shelter, equality, health, procreation, money comes maybe love” .
He argues that humans are made in the image of God with the potential to accomplish perfection in the future, and then humans will then grow to become the likeness of God. Hick accepted that if the likeness of God is to be accomplished through experiencing evil then God is partially responsible for evil. However, Hick argues that God is justified in allowing evil because we develop virtues as a result of overcoming life’s challenges. These virtues are “intrinsically more valuable than the virtues created within him ready made without effort on his own part”. Vardy’s example further supports this with the analogy of the king who falls in love with a peasant girl.
However, if someone following situation ethics wasn’t a Christian, then they would be forced to make a decision based on a religion that they don’t believe in; but it could be argued that Christian love is similar to religions all around the world. The third presumption is positivism, which states that moral commands must have a chance of a successful end. This guides the situationist due to the fact that it states that it helps
The other type of love Pausanias talks about is vulgar, common love. This love is considered bad because as Pausanias states its main focus is “to the body more than to the soul.” The main purpose of this love is simply to satisfy one’s sexual needs. Common love could both involve younger boys or female of any level of intelligence without the intentions of passing on virtue. He highly disapproves of vulgar love that he recommend laws be placed to prevent such acts. Pausanias believes love is only good when it is used for virtue and to increase one’s development and anything else is considered bad.
On the other hand Christianity, as proposed by the second most important commandment by Jesus, speaks of loving your neighbor as one loves themselves. Fundamentally the Dalai Lama takes a more idealistic approach, which focuses on the betterment of the human race, whilst Jesus’ commandment leans more towards showing love for others in the immediate. With this in mind, which of these two philosophies is most important in this day and age? And is there a significant difference between the two? Compassion is defined as ‘a feeling of sympathy and sorrow for another who is stricken by misfortune, accompanied by a strong desire to alleviate the suffering’.
Dorian Gray Literary Analysis Essay Oscar Wilde lays down a series of statements regarding beauty in a preface that seems unnecessary at first. However, in reality, these short statements lay down the basic Aesthetic beliefs that Wilde followed, including the concept that art should be viewed for one purpose and one purpose only; beauty. Thus, The Picture of Dorian Gray acts as a support system for the Aesthetic movement, explaining the advantages of a pleasurable lifestyle and the superiority of art. Wilde's preface supports the Aesthetic principle that art should be enjoyed for beauty alone. Unlike the Victorian standards of judging art based upon an underlying morality, Wilde insists that those who create and admire art only do so because it is beautiful.
The relationship between a theistic God (considering there is one) and morality cannot be explained in simply a few sentences. One may immediately come to the conclusion that God decides what is moral and immoral. This is known as Divine Command Theory which says that morality is dependent on God’s commands. However, this gives rise to the other side that says an action is moral because God approves of it. This is known as the Autonomy thesis which says that morality is not dependent on God’s commands.
These show differences as Romeo value more at immediate promises, and at the opposite, persona in Sonnet 18values more in eternal love. On the other hand, they express their love in different way although using similar or even same kinds of metaphor. Romeo expresses his love directly by expressing Juliet is more beautiful than the nature. The persona although using nature as metaphor, the tenor, however, is bout the love of himself towards his lover. Romeo is praising Juliet directly while persona in Sonnet 18is praising his love to his lover.