The Sentences In Today's Criminal Justice System

1271 Words6 Pages
The Sentences Paper In today’s criminal justice system. Crime is not always solved. The person that commits the crime is not sentenced fairly. The factors that measure the judges and jurors discretions in the sentencing process are governed by the United States constitution. The 18th amendment provides protection to all citizens against unusual sentencing. In the United States constitution the judges and jury impose sentencing it must not be with the use of torture or any other brutal practice. In referring to the early U.S.supreme court cases that involve the issuing of sentencing a citizen for 50 years of hard and painful labor. The sentencing that imposed are not to be disproportional to the offender. The 18th amendment rules and governs how criminal justice system s will handle crimes when sentencing is involved. While most states circuit court judges cannot sentence individuals to prison that are under a decree to reduce their population. Unless, others are released to make room for their inmates. The judge in this situation often has to reduce sentence or remove an individual offender of the crime charged. To keep the population at the jail for new arrivals. When the legal factor associated with this…show more content…
This term is also referred as just desert. It is also understood as an eye for an eye. Ancient laws of the justice codes reflect transformation off the idea eye for an eye. One who wrongs someone else with the same fate he bestowed the victim. According to the retribution theory punishing offenders have its advantages which may gain from illegal acts. Supporters of retribution may argue that it is wrong to let the guilty party escape punishment. To allow the guilty to avoid punishment is to deny the dignity of choosing their action. Retribution does not allow for punishment of innocent parties or for the discipline of those responsible for their
Open Document