The Peter Principle

564 Words3 Pages
“The Peter Principle”, written by Laurence J. Peter and Raymond Hall, is an essay explaining incompetence in the work force. The Peter principle states, “In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence.” Peter and Hall explain that most of the workers they did a case study on were excellent workers in what they did, but incompetence shined through when they were promoted to a higher job title. There are five case studies explained, and all of the studies have the same theme occurring. The first story featured a school teacher who noticed major incompetence among other teachers, but mostly saw lack of skill with the principal and supervisors, such as the superintendent. The workers with the highest job titles were incompetent in their field, because they were worried about all the wrong things. Instead of focusing attention of the children’s education, they were only interested in making sure all window blinds were positioned at the same levels, and other seemingly pointless things. The featured teacher could not believe how much emphasis was placed on minuscule tasks that had absolutely nothing to do with educating the students. In the other case studies, incompetence was most shown when workers gained more responsibility. The “A Universal Phenomenon” portion of this essay really explains what exactly incompetence is. Occupational incompetence is everywhere, and is seen in almost all job forms of every kind. It occurs at all levels from politics, to legal, educational, and even industrial occupations. Peter and Hall conducted data from hundreds of case studies, and they focused in on three specific case examples. They focus on a janitor who was excellent at his old job, but terrible when he was promoted. He reached a level of incompetence once promoted, meaning he will never gain more success nor will ever work his way up the

More about The Peter Principle

Open Document