Huck and Montag stand for freedom and self-reliance because they search for what is right within themselves and not what the rest do. Captain Beatty contradicts the story because he himself is really well read but heads the destruction of books. Miss Watson does this by believing in the religious and ethical values that Twain criticizes in his
Furthermore it emphasises the need for people to break bad habits of character, as they prevent one from achieving full happiness and being a moral person. Such bad habits are greed and anger, and these are referred to as vices and in order to be a good person, we must stay away from these vices. The origins of this theory date at least back to Plato and Aristotle. Although modern virtue ethics does not have to take the form known as "neo-Aristotelian", almost any modern version still shows that its roots are in ancient Greek philosophy by the employment of three concepts derived from it. These are arete (excellence or virtue) phronesis (practical or moral wisdom) and eudaimonia (usually translated as happiness or flourishing.)
2. I think that her religious beliefs were extremely important for her to survive too. Because she was praying and asking Got to help her. She was religious, it proves the fact that she did not want to work on the Sabbath. And knowing that there is somebody up there gives you power to go through.
Charles Lawrence’s essay “On Racist Speech” and C.S. Lewis’s essay “We Have No “Right To Happiness”” overall deal with this phrase out of The Declaration of Independence. They are similar in fact that they both deal with trying to be happy in our society and the way they organize their articles from beginning to end, but different in the fact that Lawrence looks at it from more of a syntax standpoint and Lewis looks at it from a moral and ethical view and they use two different tones in presenting their arguments. As said in the Declaration of Independence all men are created equal and we have the right to pursue happiness. Lawrence’s reading stresses how racist speech is a roadblock that still Lewis 2 exists today that we goes against that statement written in our countries declaration.
Consequently, other modern philosophers, such as Susan Wolf, Robert Louden, Elizabeth Anscombe and Nicholas Gier, have shared their views of Virtue Ethics. Aristotle encouraged individuals to consider their options, according to virtues, when making moral decisions. This makes it a good way to make these decisions because this generally leads to people making rational and sensible choices. Virtue Ethics teaches that we should live by the Golden Mean. This is a system that places emphasis on developing moral virtues by striving for moderation.
While these theories hold much in common regarding how they see morality, they differ greatly in their reasoning for why they think that way. Aristotelian virtue ethics focus more on the person as a moral creature at heart and their desire for morality to be the driving force behind moral behavior. An excellent example of the difference in the three theories in this instance would be a situation involving lying. Dishonesty is considered morally wrong by most theories of ethics, but all of the moral theories approach it differently. Deontology, as espoused by Immanuel Kant, would argue against the morality of lying from a moral absolutism standpoint.
‘Our ethical decisions are merely the result of our social conditioning’. Discuss. The base of our ethical decisions can only be described as a mystery to a non-philosopher, but debates have taken place between many philosophers determining whether our decisions are due to having free will, or if everything we do is pre-determined anyway. Libertarianism is the view that human agents can, when faced with a moral choice, freely act and retain moral responsibility for that act. However determinism take an opposite view to this; hard determinism is the theory that everything in the universe, including all human actions and choices has a cause which proceeds it.
But, that comes with a price. I sometimes become complacent, only focused on my motives and leaving everyone else to fend for themselves. My critical thinking skills will lead me to make ethical choices. Ethics applies to professional and societal responsibilities, as well as by providing a set of values that individuals should strive for such as kindness, compassion, integrity and responsibility . Weather it is at work, school or just walking down the street, these values still apply.
According to the Bible; whoever spares the rod hater their children, but the one who loves their children is careful to discipline Proverbs 13:24("Bible Gateway", n.d.).. The Bible also states that we should train up a child in the way they should do: when he is old he will not depart from it Proverbs 22:16 ("Bible Gateway", n.d.).. Ethically I do think that I make the right decisions regarding my children; however, since studying ethics, I do think that there was better way to handle the situation when being confronted about how I raise my children. Acting in an ethical manner is very important to the person that we become, the ethical theory that I seem to follow more often than not
Now, I’ve taken the time to research the actual definition of Moral Discipline. What I have gathered from a few websites is that it’s the determination to refrain from pretty much any negative type resulting action such as idle gossip, hurtful speech, lying, and in general just being fuckin’ retarded. Avoiding anything that will result on bad terms for yourself or more than just yourself. Now my mother always taught me my rights from wrongs. I know for a fact that I don’t follow all her morals that she raised me by but I’ve grown enough to develop my own morals.