The Learning Theory: Explanations Of Attachment

1071 Words5 Pages
Explanations of Attachment Attachments can be formed in two different ways; the learning theory focuses on rewards given to a baby, such as food and comfort. The evolutionary theory focuses on adaptation and survival. In this essay I shall be exploring the two, and their supporting and contradicting evidence. The learning theory argues that attachments are based on operant and classical conditioning. First attachments are usually formed with the primary caregiver; the one who changes their nappies, feeds them and comforts them. The learning theory was first proposed by Dollard and Miller. Skinner placed hungry animals in cages (Skinner boxes) and observed them exploring their environment, the animals eventually accidentally pressed…show more content…
Schaffer and Emmerson discovered that 39% of baby’s first attachments were not to their primary caregiver, and to the parent that is sensitive and plays with the baby more often. An experiment performed by Harlow and Zimmerman also contradicts this. Eight infant monkeys were reared in isolation and only exposed to a soft towelled “mum” that provided comfort and a wire “mum” that provided milk. It was observed that the monkeys only used the wire “mum” for nutrients, and spent 22 hours of the day with the towelled “mum”. The monkey’s attachments were tested; a loud mechanical toy was placed into the cage to scare the monkey, and whichever “mum” the monkey clung to was where the primary attachment was formed. This suggests that there is more to attachment than feeding and…show more content…
He believes that this was within the first 3 years of the child’s life. He argued that if the attachment between the caregiver and child was broken or disrupted during this sensitive period, there would be serious consequences in later relationships. There are many studies to support this theory. Hazan and Shaver developed a “love quiz”. They used two different age groups; 108 undergraduate students, and 630 men and women who replied to an advert. They were asked three different sets of questions; a tick list of adjectives that best suited their childhood experiences, and three different descriptions of their romantic relationships now. Through their results they were deemed to be a “secure type” that “express belief in lasting love”, an “anxious type” that are “doubtful about existence of love” and “ambivalent” that “fell in love easily. The study revealed strong relationships between childhood attachment type, and adult attachment
Open Document