Right to know criteria for excellence in research. (Correct) This right is a little more difficult to define. Because “excellence” has both objective and subjective criteria, personal preference may keep the list of criteria from being as specific as we would like. However, those who are doing evaluations should work to make the criteria as specific and clear as possible so people can make choices about how to shape their own work. Right for key people to be protected so that work is done effectively.
As previously noted, these pertain to those who sponsor the research, those who collect the data, and those who offer them. The sponsors should ask for the study to be done to better the purpose of the organization, and not for any other self-serving reason. They should respect the confidentiality of the data obtained by the researcher, and not ask for the individual or group responses to be disclosed to them, or ask to see the questionnaires. They should have an open mind in accepting the results and recommendations in the report presented by the researchers.” (p.
The research is written as such that the best interest of the service user is considered within the research highlighting the value principles of the researchers themselves, where there is consideration for equality, dignity and respect. Although the article does not conclude any evidence outcomes, it is still important to note that evidence based practice is often the basis for decision making and implementing research findings into practice. Evidence based research involves identifying the best available answer to questions that are raised on an identified need albeit that of a service user or organisation. It involves a process of evaluating the evidence and its effectiveness in informing practice and intervention (McLaughlin, 2007). One could argue that evidence based practice bridges the gap between research and practice with its focus on outcomes.
Perhaps more so than Emotivists, Prescriptivists see ethical language as fairly meaningful. They believe that the terms used are able to create absolute rules that everyone ought to follow. It would seem that ethical language is seen by many as very meaningful, although for varying reasons. However agent centred theories such as Virtue Ethics would argue that our main focus of morality should be on becoming as virtuous as possible, rather than deciding what is meant by ethical language. Therefore it would seem that perhaps morality should be more focussed on individuals’ actions rather then defining what is meant by ‘good’ and
Multiple methods. Competent marketing researchers shy away from over-reliance on any one method, preferring to adapt the method to the problem rather than the other way around. They also recognize the desirability of gathering information from multiple sources to give greater confidence. 4. Interdependence of models and data.
The stakeholder theory acknowledges the shareholder’s importance but asserts that they aren’t the only ones whose interests should be considered. The Board of Directors (Incorrect) They are responsible for shepherding the process of reporting the results. While they care about the integrity of the clinical trials, in this particular setting they are not actively involved in the decision. Carson Nelson, Chief Executive Officer (Incorrect) While the CEO will eventually be part of the conversation, the primary conversation will be happening with the Chief Legal Officer. Cary Bryant, Chief Legal
I believe that 8.07 Deception in Research may be the main principle that would apply since the researcher may downplay the pain, emotional distress and risks that may be associated with this study. This then leads into 8.014 Sharing Research Data for Verification which would mean the researcher could not withhold their data so that it could be compared by other
By italicizing the directly quoted section(s) of text and then citing the author, one is giving proper acknowledgement of the use of another person’s ideas and material. Recognizing plagiarism is difficult because one must have knowledge of the material that has been published prior to reading of the “offending” material. However one can recognize plagiarism when one sees it in the material one is researching for other work or studies. Avoiding plagiarism is a fairly simple matter of making sure that one is not using another author’s words (without citation). It is also possible to make use of plagiarism checking programs.
As for the procedures in the article itself, there seems to be an over-reliance on anecdotal evidence, with the argument being supported with stories about one person or with hypothetical situation. There is a distinct lack of hard data, but as the author acknowledges that there is a need for more empirical research, this should not necessarily be taken against her. Furthermore, this article is a part of a mini-series dealing with this topic and
Archives are records, usually but not necessarily non-current records, of enduring value selected for permanent preservation. Archives will normally be preserved in an archival institution. The lifecycle concept has been useful in promoting a sense of order, a systematic approach, to the overall management of recorded information. However, juxtaposition of the records continuum and the lifecycle model shows that the records continuum models advantages outweighs the advantages of the lifecycle concept.