The House on Mango Street vs. of Mice and Men

497 Words2 Pages
At first glance, Sandra Cisneros’s The House on Mango Street and John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men seem like very different books. Where Of Mice and Men is considered a classic, The House on Mango Street is very modern. However, underneath the surface are some key similarities such as focus on introspection and de-emphasis on events in plot. The most obvious significant difference between The House on Mango Street and Of Mice and Men is format/structure. While Of Mice and Men is not exactly the most conventionally structured book ever published, The House on Mango Street features a very unique vignette format, with short, seemingly inconsequential chapters that don’t directly connect to each other. Of Mice and Men follows a more orthodox approach to novel writing, with linear plot development. Building on this is another obvious difference. Of Mice and Men is regarded as classic literature, although, originally published in 1937, it is not a very old classic. Similarly, The House on Mango Street, with its highly unconventional structure and lack of clear resolution, is very modern in style, and was first published in 1984. While both books feature unclear resolution plot-wise (George’s life after killing Lenny in Of Mice and Men and Esperanza’s life after her epiphanies), The House on Mango Street does feature some mental/emotional resolution where Of Mice and Men has very little. In the last chapter of The House on Mango Street, Esperanza contemplates her feelings about her house, her family, and her future, and comes to new conclusions, most of which betray her earlier feelings of hate towards the house and environment she lives in. At the end of Of Mice and Men, George’s feelings are left very much unclear. He clearly seems conflicted and distracted, but, because the novel is in third-person, these emotions are left unexplained. Perhaps the most
Open Document