Cult sensations are ephemeral, meaning they are popular at the time but are short lived and will not stand the test of time. For a romance novel to stand the test of time it must achieve telling stories of love in dramatic and exciting ways at an exceptional level. A truly great love story has tension, conflict and genuine uncertainty about how things will turn out. William Shakespeare wasknown for his beauty of language, he was known to capture the very heart of love. ‘Romeo and Juliet’ is a description of love and also the consequence of love.
Other ways that the story was conveyed was through a combination of McCandless’s letters and diaries, guesswork, and investigation that was conducted. In the movie, however, it seemed as though only Christopher’s sister was telling the story. She was always talking about how he failed in contacting her but she reassured us that she was “strong” enough to handle it. I wish that they had other people talk besides her, because the mixture of formats was about the best thing in the story. One scene in the novel has always stuck with me more than the rest.
In the rather dramatic soliloquy, Doran cuts out almost half of the lines. He does this to get his point across fast, and easy. He knows that the works of Shakespeare are already hard to understand, especially for a younger audience, so he takes the most important lines and uses those. He keeps the attention of the audience and still is able to keep the Shakespearian feel to the play. Although the Shakespearian feel was definitely effected by having a very modern twist.
A rule every man should know is women want everything in the alphabet from A-Z and that just Aint happening. I will say though that Tom got pretty close he was below R for Ring that I do know. The worse part about this movie is she wasn’t satisfied with nothing she was just obnoxious. He got punch in the face for her and she took a dump on his pride. that wasn’t the worse part she gave him some and he was right back on the leash.
Even though The Catcher in the Rye is usually considered only a "minor" classic of American fiction, it is a very popular novel that frequently provokes strong reactions--both positive and negative--from its readers. In fact, The Catcher in the Rye is one of the most widely read and discussed works in the American literary canon. Despite its widespread popularity and significant reputation, however, some critics argue that it is too vulgar, immoral, and immature to be considered serious literature. Moreover, a few teachers and parents have censored the novel because they feel that it will corrupt children who read it. While there are undoubtedly subversive, or corrupt elements in the novel, arguments for censoring it generally misrepresent its more nobler intentions and greatly exaggerate its subversive designs.
Of course, American women can call men fat anytime they want and get away with it. TV sitcoms regularly portray men as stupid, fat slobs, who capitulate to their women and rarely say more than “Yes, dear. Whatever you say, dear.” It’s different in Thailand, right? Wrong. Sort of.
Hughes becomes obsessed with shooting the film realistically, aiming to be perfect and organized film. But his passion remain the same, the aviation. And even he crashed in a beet field because of pushing a new speed record, he never give up. But also, bad advantages of OCD affect to perform his everyday lives characterized by the repetition of phrases, and a phobia of dust and germs. The sad thing, Hughes grows increasingly paranoid, planting microphones and tapping Gardner's phone lines to keep track of her.
The scene in which this is expressed represents women of the late 19th century in a proper but ridiculous manner. The treatment of girls toward each other is seen in the scene where Cecily and Gwendolen discover that they are both engaged to “Ernest”. When the girls first meet each other, they are instantly fond of each other. Gwendolen even goes as far to say, “I like you already more than I can say”(Act II, 78). However, when they discover that they are both engaged to Ernest, they go back and forth insulting each other and claiming that “Ernest” has changed his mind about the other women, all the while in a polite manner.
This is a regrettable thing, for the original is always better than a copy. However this does not diminish Robin Hood Prince of Thieves in any way even although the plot has been slightly rearranged. Even though the humour is slightly more suited for older responders the film generally rolls together. On the other hand, Robin Hood is everything the stereotypical hero should be. It is a little obvious to older responders that this movie would end with the hero going out with a trill of fanfare.
In my essay I tried to compare one of my favorite screen adaptation of great novel and Scott Fitzgerald's original text. When attempting to write this into the film, screen Francis Ford Coppola failed to create the same feeling, even though most of the dialogue in the movie is taken from the original literary classic. The movie had grateful review and recommendations from the audience . I enjoyed watching it and think the director made a good job. As I think, sets, costumes and camera work are perfect.