Cult vs Classic

1023 Words5 Pages
O classic, classic, shall you be taken over by cult? Kaila Brown, Bliss There has been much debate about whether cult sensations such as ‘Twilight’, should replace the classics such as ‘Romeo and Juliet’ and ‘Pride and Prejudice’, and whether they are unrealistic, out dated and irrelevant. To find out if these classics still hold a place in modern society, Bliss reporter Kaila Brown delves into the differences between classic and cult, the ideals of love in the classics and the romantic principles presented in the classics, and how they shape the modern texts of today. Classic and cult. What is the difference? Classic and cult sensations may both be very popular, but they both have very different characteristics. A classic is universal, pertaining to people of different race, age and social class. Texts such as ‘Romeo and Juliet’ and ‘Pride and Prejudice’ are classified as classics as they were written in past centuries and were so unique and original for the time period that they were written in. Because of this they hold an artistic quality, making them of high value. Classics will stand the test of time unlike cult sensations such as ‘Twilight’. Cult sensations have a very strong interest at the time they are written. They aren’t classified as classics as they have been written recently. Cult sensations are ephemeral, meaning they are popular at the time but are short lived and will not stand the test of time. For a romance novel to stand the test of time it must achieve telling stories of love in dramatic and exciting ways at an exceptional level. A truly great love story has tension, conflict and genuine uncertainty about how things will turn out. William Shakespeare wasknown for his beauty of language, he was known to capture the very heart of love. ‘Romeo and Juliet’ is a description of love and also the consequence of love. The romantic qualities the
Open Document