Frankenstein And Blade Runner: A Literary Analysis

855 Words4 Pages
The theme of disruption refers to the unbalancing of what is natural, a theme which is explored and opinionated in Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein (1817) and Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner (Director’s cut), where ‘disruptive’ actions of individuals, involving the exploitation of nature, bring about [ironically] the character’s own downfall, and more importantly, an undesired outcome whilst playing god. The critical theme outlined in both texts is humanity’s desire for power which leads to the rejection of our natural world, and this, by extension, means turning to technology and other unconventional methods in order to gain knowledge and distinction. Shelley specifically cautions against scientific advancement and the obsession which follows…show more content…
“I shall no longer see the sun or stars, or feel the winds play on my cheek” shows how well Shelley juxtaposes an ‘ugly’ image [creature] against the sly nature sublime, suggesting that the creature, despite his creation, was a part of nature. Ultimately, it relates back to the theme of the novel, reminding us of the consequences of knowledge by disrupting nature, undesired outcomes are bound to occur. This natural imagery is contrasted in Blade Runner. In the opening scene, the cityscape is devoid of any natural elements, implying the degradation of the world to technology. The disruption of our natural environment gives way to more corporatism, globalism and…show more content…
The creature is eloquent and seems peaceful in nature, he [it] finds comfort there. Tyrell, despite being the genius mind behind the creation of replicants, does not live in great technological prestige, rather, a more classical simple home. This is evident with the scene we first meet Tyrell, his house is lit with candles rather than electricity which is unexpected. This portrays many things, but the utmost important is both their wit and wisdom. Both Tyrell and the creature are sure of their identity, something the protagonists of these texts [Deckard, Victor F.] are not. “The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long, and you have burned so very, very brightly Roy” Dr Tyrell states this in full awareness of his impending death but the sublime message was that replicant or not, there was no escaping the genetic design of a human, hence, depicting the embodiment of the human condition: always wanting more and wanting want you can’t have. Tyrell proves his wisdom with the fail-safe four year life span built into all new model replicants. The parallels between the creature in Frankenstein, and Roy Batty in Blade Runner, the leader of the fugitive replicants, are obvious. Both are living creations of scientific endeavours, therefore, raising many of the moral and ethical concerns which a modern
Open Document