The Drunkard & Rdquo Analysis

860 Words4 Pages
“The Drunkard” Questions 1. The humor in this story appears when the son is thirsty and gets drunk off of his father’s drink. The humor arises because of the situation and because of the boy’s drunken observations of life. While drunk, the little boy seems to overreact to the situations, a problem that results from intoxication, and his overanalyzed perception of the occurrences are what is funny. It is funny when the boy begins to sing and sings even louder because he believes his father missed the point of his singing, and the fact that the boy is doing everything the drunken father would have done is humorous too. 2. Pathos is the emotional appeal to the reader, and while this story is humorous, it does contain…show more content…
The boy’s drunkenness is seen from his perspective, his father’s perspective, the ladies on the street’s perspective, and his mother’s perspective. Each character or set of characters has a different reaction to the boy’s drunkenness, and their reaction includes a bias that affects the way the reader perceives the situation. For example, the boy’s extreme reactions and perceptions of the different situations appear humorous. For example, when Larry began singing, he only sang louder despite his father’s shushing because Larry wanted to get his point across. From the perspective of Larry’s mother and the women on the street, Larry’s drunkenness is not a positive thing and much disappointment and blame for this is put on Larry’s father and irresponsibility. And then considering the situation from Larry’s father’s point of view, Larry’s drunkenness was a result of his own doing. Larry’s father did not find himself at fault because his son drank the beer and made a choice to get drunk. The father believed that he had a right to socialize, free from the worries of his…show more content…
The principle irony of this story is that the son was sent along to keep the father from getting drunk, and in the end, the son was the one who ended up getting drunk. It is also ironic that the mother was thankful her son got drunk rather than his father. Ideally, the mother would be upset that her underage child got drunk. 7. This story is told in retrospect, from the perspective of a man looking back on his childhood. Telling the story from this perspective makes the story even more humorous because even from a mature vantage point, the effects of the alcohol were still conveyed as accurately as when Larry was actually drunk. Being told from a mature vantage point, this story receives more credibility, and is more effective because it functions as a funny story from childhood. 8. I believe that Larry’s father did actually give up his liquor temporarily because he was very diligent in calculating the money he saved from not drinking. He got caught up in his success and started assuming himself above others who squandered his money, so it was his pride that allowed him to continue his abstinence from alcohol. Larry’s father was a prideful man, like when he talked to the people at the funeral, so in one sense, his pride was good for him. However, Larry’s father did gave in when he had a celebratory
Open Document