Spyder Case Essay

430 Words2 Pages
1. How at all value depends on ownership capital structure of company? Kelly was a founder of CHB Capital Partners. In his opinion one of the strength of the firm is ability to provide growing company with high-level management expertise. Also he explained the importance of the company’s orientation in the future. He marked that CEO partners care much more about what we and they can make their business be worth 3-5 years from now than the valuation they put on the business today. The deal with Spyder, CHB took between a 20% and 80% stake in a company. The CHB team working on the Spider had a strong rapport with Jacobs. Also CHB was prepared to invest about $5 million in Spyder and was willing to accept a minority stake, the company was intent on arranging a deal which would yield a minimum 30% return. Both sides agreed to deal that CHB investing a total of $4.5 million in two stages. Upon the completion of the deal, the firm would put in $2.5 million in exchange for preferred stock convertible into 22% of Spyder common stock. Later CHB have the option to invest an additional $2 million – half of which would be a cash payment to be split by Jacobs and his partners. If CHB elected to invest at both stages, it’s stake would increase to 37.9% of common stock. Finally, by September 25, Spyder’s relationship with CHB officially began, with private equity firm infusing $ 2.5 million in capital into the company. Both Jacobs and Kelly with their team began the task of making operational a strategy for a firm. Kelly and Flanigan jointed Spyder’s board. One of the 1st step was to invest in a state-of-the-art IT system specially in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system from J.D.Edwards. In spite of that the system would cost the company about $ 1 million it was made decision to invest in a high-level ERP system. The 2d step management was to invest in new key

More about Spyder Case Essay

Open Document