Individuals understand that in those forms of entertainment, it is all for show and no one actually gets in trouble or even hurt. Individuals will not believe that it is fine for them to use the criminal behavior they have seen in Hollywood films and games because in reality, they would get in trouble. This portrayal of gangster from the media will not corrupt the minds of youth because most gangster related films, games, and music is intended for adult audiences and these forms of entertainment will not reach the level of youth. Most of this content is R rated or PG-13 so the youth in society will not be able to see the constant display of thug culture throughout society. Despite that, thug related games such as the Grand Theft Auto series and Mafia II & II,
These concerns directly impact human rights, the law and everyday life for those affected particularly the young and ethnic minority groups since these are the groups disproportionately represented moreover allegations still exist that despite the Steven Lawrence case of 1993, institutional racism still exists. With stop and search the police deliberately force allegations upon and use the law indiscriminately where certain suspects are accused and the criticisms constantly and inherently labelled at the police are fully justified. What’s more the subsequent police conduct once searched is believed to be unpleasant and discriminatory; additionally the manner of searches can be humiliating and embarrassing for those involved. Overall stop and search is an ineffective method of investigating and disrupting crime for numerous and long standing reasons. One, is that the rate of arrests is extremely poor in co-ordination to the ratio of stops; the stop/search to arrest rate declined from 17per cent in 1986 to just 10 per cent between 1996 to 98, (McConville & Wilson, 2002, pg559).
The act of stealing and thievery has a negative effect on multiple parties. I have heard it to be said, if that the prices of electronics media were not as high as they are, then piracy would not be such a prevailing problem. Is it possible to strike an appropriate balance between the rights of both groups on this issue? No it’s not right to strike between both groups because the artists, musicians, writers and others have absolute control over their works and how they might be consumed, or distributed. The only right the public has is to buy it under the conditions that are offered or for them to move on to something else.
The people that support censorship should try to make it harder to download music illegally. By doing this, they would accomplish two things. One, the music industry would grow even more, and two, the “bad” songs with words they feel should be censored would be harder to gain. If people knew they had to pay for this then they might choose their song downloads more carefully. Im conclusion, no I don’t believe music should be censored.
The first reason why getting tough on criminals does not work is because for the most part, they are not deterred You must Login to view the entire essay. If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free! by increased punishment for the crimes they commit. For smaller crimes such as parking violations and speeding tickets, deterrence seems to work because people committing these crimes are not considered criminals, rather law abiding citizens who have made a mistake and are aware of the punishment. The fact that the penalty for armed robbery has gone up to twelve years from nine years does not pass through a criminals mind because they genuinely do not expect to be caught for the crimes they commit.
Because of this unending drug, the perception of Mexico, a nation which strongly emphasizes Catholic values, has quickly shifted. The drug war has affected the country detrimentally as strong censorship rules have been imposed, the safety and security of its people at risk, and the country’s relations with other countries such as the United States are questionable. Drug trafficking “refers to the sale and distribution of illegal drugs” (Drug Trafficking). It is something that is taken as an offense to many because it is against the law and often displeasing. Drug trafficking, in years past, have been very present in countries like Cuba, where drug lords attempted to run the country.
The parental advisory sticker on music Certain albums contain explicit lyrics. Although there is a parental advisory sticker, some people don't pay any mind to it. The parental adivory sticker should not be used because it may lead to illegal actions, record companies won't make as much money, and adults that are able to buy it would buy it for a minor. By using the parental advisory sticker it promtes illegal actions. Minors will be so eager to get it that they could download it from a computer.
* Health risk Each of us have the right to be free, so why athletes does not have the right to take drugs, in fact taking drugs can help them to achieve their own goals. Even if they’re risking their lives it is still worth it. If we prohibit the people who are smoking and risking their lives, why do we have to forbid the athletes from taking drugs and risking their lives to pursue
The concept of surveillance can therefore involve numerous techniques, as will be discussed later within this paper. For the average law abiding citizen the issue of surveillance has different debatable point of views. One argument that can be drawn is whether an individual’s choice of privacy is being stripped with the advancement and placement of surveillance implementations (need to be reworded). Should this choice also be extended to those who commit serious deviant crimes? Offenders who are convicted of sex crimes are often considered some of the most dangerous to society, thus deemed in need of constant monitoring and surveillance when in the community.
We could actually save, and even make money if all drugs were legal. All the money spent on drugs and addicts would be spent voluntarily. We wouldn’t need high tech machinery to find drugs because dealers and drug smuggler would be put out of business. We would have no reason for them if drugs were legal. All the money we saved from legalizing drugs could be spent on education and other things that would actually approve America.