Sexual Favoritism in the Workplace

637 Words3 Pages
Sexual Favoritism in the Workplace Webster University Sexual Favoritism in the Workplace Sexual favoritism is defined as a consensual relationship between a supervisor and subordinate. The subordinate receives benefits such as a promotion, benefits or preferential because of the relationship. Sexual favoritism in the workplace can have a negative impact on the entire work center. In 1990, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission adopted its Policy Guidance on Employer Liability under Title VII. Title VII does not prohibit isolated incidences of preferential treatment because of a consensual sexual relationship or special treatment because the individual is a spouse or friend. However, employers can be held liable based on these three exceptions: implied quid pro quo, sexual favors that are considered to be widespread within the workplace, or the jilted lover scenario (Title VII and the Workplace Romance", 2012) The first exception is the quid pro quo rule. This rule states that the employee who submits to an employer’s sexual advances and benefits from it may not be able to file sexual harassment charges later, however, co-workers may have a claim. When an employee receives advancement because of the relationship, co-workers who have more seniority or are more qualified for the promotion may file a claim that they were discriminated against, arguing that sexual favors was an implied condition of receiving the promotion. When managers communicate that fair treatment in the workplace, is based on an employee’s willingness to submit to sexual advances, this can be a form of implied quid pro quo sexual harassment (EEOC, n.d.). The second exception is widespread favoritism. This is based on an environment where granting sexual favors is the norm in the workplace. Employees who do not participate in this conduct can

More about Sexual Favoritism in the Workplace

Open Document