Employment Law Sexual Harassment Research Paper FARAGHER v. CITY OF BOCA RATON Professor: Julie Girten Brian Ellison November 22, 2012 HRM 320 1.) Define sexual harassment as the term is used legally. Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature that tends to create a hostile or offensive work environment. Sexual harassment is a form of Sex Discrimination that occurs in the workplace. Persons who are the victims of sexual harassment may sue under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C.A.
The decision of whether the appellee had constructive or actual knowledge of intoxication will determine the question of responsibility for the reckless and violent actions of another. Deborah White vs. Patrick Gibbs and Stand Alone Properties, L.L.C., d/b/a O’Malley’s Tavern is a civil case in which Deborah White, the plaintiff or appellant, is opposing summary judgment as requested by the defendant or appellee, Patrick Gibbs. Patrick Gibbs is the owner of O’Malley’s Tavern, the establishment blamed for the death of Bruno White, Deborah White’s husband. Mrs. White would like the case to go to trial, and to do so, her representation must prove that the facts of the case dispute material fact. The existence of material fact in a complaint means that the case at hand is straightforward and
The events of 9/11 have created hatred, fear, discrimination and Americans have begun racial profiling because of the Arabs who participated in the attacks. Arabs in America are no longer treated as normal American citizens because many stereotype them to be just like those terrorists who attacked America. The hatred for Arabs began immediately after America became aware of who participated in the attacks. Even a year after the attacks, the Justice Department was still aiming their attention on those from the Middle East and South Asia. As if being interrogated isn’t bad enough, they were also incarcerated and deported for just being their skin color.
Sexual harassment falls into two categories: quid pro quo sexual harassment and hostile environment sexual harassment. Quid pro quo is “this for that”. For example, if a supervisor propositions a subordinate with a raise if she goes out with him-constitutes as quid pro quo. When one party interferes with the work performance of the victim in an unreasonable manner, or exposes the victim to a rude, lewd and uncomfortable work environment, it constitutes a hostile environment sexual harassment. Both victim and the harasser can be either a woman or a man, and the victim and harasser can be the same sex.
They blamed the chief not giving any promotions even they work hard, instead he gave them "back of the house" positions and gave "front of the house" positions to the less experienced Caucasian employees. They also claimed that they were exposed to some racial harassment when they complained about their position. According to this example if this case is just like what these employees told, then we can totally say that there is racism in that work place. If any employees are exposed to any race-hate talk, any injustice because of their race or any threat of being fired if they try to defend themselves then we can obviously say that there is a direct sign of discrimination and racism because “racism is the belief that a particular race is superior or inferior to another, that a person’s social and moral traits are predetermined by his or her inborn biological characteristics” and in this work place we see that there is a belief of a superior race . So it can be seen that there is an inequality between people because of their inborn biological characteristics.
The Unjust of Just law Ethics 110 22 Jun 2010 In a democratic state it is in never within our rights to break the law. Breaking the law leads to lawlessness and disobedience from the democracy that we have worked, or have been born into. If the law is unjust, then it might be fair to break that law as long as you are willing to suffer the consequences of punishment set aside for that particular unjust law. Failure to adhere to the punishment is unjust as well, for failure to adhere to the punishment of the law is a statement that you do not respect the laws of your society. Martin Luther King Jr. states “Oppressed People cannot remain oppressed forever.” (Cahn, 2009 p. 387) As we have seen throughout history, this is a true statement.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), it is stated that: “It is unlawful to harass a person (an applicant or employee) because of that person’s sex. Harassment can include “sexual harassment” or unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical harassment of a sexual nature. Harassment does not have to be of a sexual nature, however, and can include offensive remarks about a person’s sex. For example, it is illegal to harass a woman by making offensive comments about women in general. Both victim and the harasser can be either a woman or a man, and the victim and harasser can be the same sex.
Another Major flaw was that “the country, whose president, Woodrow Wilson, had dreamt up the idea of the League - America -, refused to join it.” The league’s most powerful militaries Britain and France not only suffered casualties, but also economically as they were greatly in debt to the United States. Because of this neither country was enthusiastic to get involved in disputes that did not affect Western Europe. Therefore the League had no military might and could only enforce economic sanctions in hope that they worked against aggressive nations. All these flaws point to signs that the League of Nations was a failure. However, even though there were a few setbacks, the league was a success in many ways.
I feel that once you use drugs in a work place you put other employees at risk. Employers do not need to ask about your prescription drugs, such as medication intake or cigarettes usage unless the quantity of your usage of a certain substances can interfere with your work duty. Employers do not even have the rights to request the list of your prescription medications, unless they are aware that you’re taken a particular dose that can harm others. The moral philosophy arguments are not an area we have historically put significant campaigning resources behind, primarily because other lines of argument - concerning impacts on public health and criminal justice. But it should be a concerned morally for someone to understand that if you’re taken what ever kind of drugs rather its prescription or Illegal, it can impact the way you think or the way you act towards your fellow employees.
Sexual Harrasment: It is unlawful to harass a person (an applicant or employee) because of that person’s sex. Harassment can include “sexual harassment” or unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical harassment of a sexual nature. Harassment does not have to be of a sexual nature, however, and can include offensive remarks about a person’s sex. For example, it is illegal to harass a woman by making offensive comments about women in general. Both victim and the harasser can be either a woman or a man, and the victim and harasser can be the same sex.