Sex Offenders: Neighbor or Nuisance?

973 Words4 Pages
In this essay there will be a comparison and synthesis between three articles on the familiarities and differences they have based on the residency restrictions of sex offenders. “Approximately six hundred thousand of these inmates will return to communities across the country each year,” says Mary Farkas and Gale Miller in their article “Reentry and Reintegration: Challenges Faced by the Families of Convicted Sex Offenders“(1). Farkas and Miller’s article is about the families of the offenders and their challenges in community. In Caleb Durling’s article “Never Going Home: Does it Make Us Safer? Does it Make Sense? Sex Offenders, Residency Registrations, and Reforming Risk Management Law,” Durling argues about the security of the community and how they feel when sex offenders are let “loose” in the neighborhood. In the final article, written by Paul Applebaum, “Law and Psychiatry: Sex Offenders in Community: Are Current Approaches Counterproductive,” Applebaum speaks more in depth about the law and the challenges it faces. These three articles all have the argument in common that sex offenders returning to the community is difficult and even question if it is possible for them to be returned at all, but Farkas and Miller show the point of view from the families, Applebaum shows the point of view from the law, and Durling shows the point of view from the sex offenders. In my opinion, I agree that they all three have hard challenges, but I feel the community has the hardest ones. So what is the major issue with sex offenders being returned to society? According to Farkas and Miller, the challenge is for the families and how the offenders actually need their family to succeed in the community, “…the role of family in influencing the success of former prisoners upon release” (2). Although, Durling and Applebaum both feel the challenge is with the community and

More about Sex Offenders: Neighbor or Nuisance?

Open Document