The people that Shelton killed are considered combatants because they support they governmental system and work with it. Based on Just War Theory, the proportionality of killing these people is that their deaths are outweighed by the justice that will bring to the judicial system. Shelton believes the system to be corrupt, focusing instead on conviction rates rather than making sure the right person is placed behind bars. By killing these people Shelton can put a new mindset into the “system” because those affected by the killings will want the right man punished rather since they now know how it feels to be wronged. All the killings made by Shelton were to people who were directly showed how flawed the system was.
Nowadays, horrifying crimes are being committed by criminals and they are being punished for it. It has been believed that behind every crime there is a reason, which usually gets neglected. In the world of justice, reasons doesn’t matter, only thing that matters is whoever did the crime has to be punished and everyone should get justice. From the articles “How people turn monstrous” by Mark Buchanan and “Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment” by Philip G. Zimbardo, which means human behavior is forceful. The good people always get forced inherently into the bad situation.
Like Thoreau, Dr. King feels that there is an innate good in all people, and knows that the collective cannot idly sit by while their compatriots are done an injustice. At the exact same time, however, Dr. King is aware of the effects of psychological deindividuation found in group settings when he acknowledges that “groups tend to be more immoral than individuals” ( 12). This statement is more an attack on the white oppressors than anything else. Through deindividuation, Dr. King reduces his opponents to faceless masses incapable of thinking for themselves, but rather are subject to the mob mentality. Dr. King recognizes that this is a potential flaw in collective action, but the justice pursued by his movement prevents his collective from such ill effects.
And that is his speech impediment. He has that blemish so that he as equal as everyone else and that he is not a perfect person. It shows that a life lost is a sacrifice for the greater good of the King’s, and the country in which they fight for. This shows that when the people come in contact with each other one must not aggravate another or the other shall be upset. It foreshadows the upcoming events.
The Presence of Evil My personal belief is that evil is categorized as a deontological. I believe this because I feel that with deontology it’s up to the people to decide, in regards to respect and honesty, whether they want to be a person who can be trusted and act on good consciousnessor one who cannot. Teleological views do not match my definition of evil, because I truly believe that evil isn’t what makes people unhappy, it’s the events and the people that are surrounding the situation that can bring out the evil, which in turn makes the situation and the people involved in it, evil. September 11th 2001 was a day that will go down in the history of the United States, as the day evil struck our great country. These
Small though it be, it will make many mistakes, because it will be composed of men. Discord will reign there” (Democracy, Voltaire). His opinions on the pursuit of progress with abandon were that progress should be sought after but not without humanity and rationale in mind. He would not have wanted progress to be had on the sacrifice of human rights or the loss of rationality. He was somebody who “believed in progress and in the virtues of civilization, contrary to Rousseau’s belief that civilization corrupts man” (Voltaire, New World Encyclopedia).
A good leader is someone who loves to lead other people and does his or her very best at it, in such a way that other people love to be led and do their very best, too. Also, what makes a good leader is also a bit more than that. A good leader has many desirable personal qualities and has learned the practical skills needed to excel in his or her job. A good leader is an inspiration to the members of his team and at the same time is able to fulfill or exceed the expectations of his or her superiors (if such exist). The traits of a good leader include personal attributes that also make you a great person overall.
If too kind he will be taken advantage of and if too cruel he will be hated by his subjects. However he will have better security of his kingdom by being feared rather than loved. Therefore, a prince must be cruel to teach a lesson, gain loyalty, and strike fear of his subjects, which is what Peter the Great did during his reign of Russia. Peter's cruelty influenced many of his decisions concerning the Russian Military. He was quick to suppress any revolts and his punishments were almost always harsh to show that he was not to be betrayed.
This staple of his beliefs is why he doesn't fear death, but in fact looks forward to it. By escaping he is committing an unjust act against the state, and committing unjust acts ruins the soul. With a ruined soul there is no point in living life as the soul is the only important thing, not the body. Therefore the most important thing is not only living life, but living a just life. While Socrates arguments may be sound in his opinion, I'm not sure if I agree with them.
His advice for rulers covered a broad range of subjects, including reputation, cruelty, defense, and generosity. One of his ideas was how it was better for a prince to be feared than loved by his people. If a ruler was too well liked and loved, he could easily have been taken advantage of which could eventually lead to disorder. If his people feared the prince, order would be maintained in his state because the community would be scared to revolt or try to take control of the prince. A second idea of