Rhetorical Analysis

1208 Words5 Pages
Rhetorical Analysis is a form of criticism. Criticism goes back to the days of Plato and even earlier times than him. Two authors by the names of Steven Johnson and Dana Stevens both have written a piece on watching television. The views oppose each other on how television may actually make you smarter or not. Steven Johnson’s article called “Watching TV Makes You Smarter” directs his writing to the audience of people who watch television, with the claim that watching television makes you smarter. On the other hand Dana Stevens’ article called “Thinking Outside the Idiot Box” disagrees with Johnson’s article and claims watching TV does not make you smarter. Steven Johnson seems to believe that watching TV makes you smarter. He released an article to the audience of people who watch television. Around ninety-nine percent of families in America own a television, which means they watch TV a little bit each day. So Steven Johnson is writing to a very big audience and tries to persuade to them that watching TV makes you smarter. He starts out his article with a conversation of two scientists from the Woody Allen’s movie Sleeper. The script was supposed to be an opening joke because in the movie all the food that is supposed to be bad for you, turned out to be good for you in the future. The central claim of Steven Johnson’s article would be that watching TV makes you smarter. Steven Johnson states, “…the culture is getting more cognitively demanding, not less.” The author is trying to point out that to follow today’s television shows are a lot more complicated than shows back in the day. “24” as an example, before watching any random episode you would need to know the characters, make social connections between characters, and so on and so forth. Steven Johnson hopes that the readers will feel smarter for watching TV after reading his article. For
Open Document