Punishment In Celtic & Roman Britian

592 Words3 Pages
Punishment has taken many different forms throughout history. This essay looks at how punishment of offenders today has elements of Celtic and Roman approaches. According to Celtic philosophy of punishment, deterrence was used as a measure to prevent people from committing an offence as it is today. In Celtic times honour amongst the kinship was important and criminals were cast the lowest social status losing this honour and civil privilege. This loss of privilege still pertains to Britain today and although our prisons provide the incapacitation of offenders, social isolation in Celtic times had similar impact with loss of property, profession, religious rites and confinement to the tribal territory suffering their dishonour within their community. “Righting the wrong” in terms of retribution and restoration are keys principles of justice today as they were for the Celts. Monetary fines were imposed requiring a guarantor of equal or higher social standing. Non-payment of fines today can lead to imprisonment and likewise in Celtic law isolation from the tribe, albeit not in a prison, had comparable effect on the offender. A benefit of such fines was in the compensation of victims, a scheme still employed today through the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority. Rehabilitation and Reform were encouraged in Celtic Britain where punishment included useful work and offenders were allowed to tend their land to redeem themselves back into the tribe although not permitted to leave the territory. Community service, ASBOS and Electronic tagging are similar measures in modern Britain with education in prison and compensation orders currently implemented as restorative and rehabilitative processes. In contrast Roman philosophy of punishment incorporated imprisonment, hard labour and the death penalty. There were eight kinds of punishment –fines, flogging,
Open Document