The protest was over African American voting rights, as few African Americans could vote due to racist whites manipulating the voting system. African Americans shied away from voting because of fear of being harassed or absurd tests were given, such as stating the entire U.S Constitution. Johnson’s purpose of his speech was to convince Congress and Americans everywhere to pass his bill on voting reformation. To help make the speech more effective and convincing, Johnson used rhetorical strategies, such as ethos, logos, and pathos. Johnson’s first part of the speech uses rhetorical qualities that unify the audience and make them sympathize with the victims of voting rights.
Individuals can easily become tired of the hate that divides one society into two. Joint efforts of individuals that are bound by non-violent values are the pinnacle force in resolving a brutal conflict. Driven by the cause of a united society, their qualities and beliefs begin to appeal to others burdened by the conflict. In South Africa, we saw the dark period of Apartheid separate the whites from the blacks. As peaceful protests would turn into massacres, violent clashes amongst the two groups were beginning to resemble a civil war.
This de facto bigotry made it more difficult for civil rights activist to change the hearts and minds of the activists, and made politicians reticent about their support of the campaign, for fear of losing public support. The Klan spread their hateful message through the Southern States, inciting similar violence against the activists, and persuading the public that passing the Civil Rights Act would “open the bedroom doors of our white women to Negro men” this led to a lack of support for the movement, and a strong belief in the actions and motives of the Klan. The activities of the Klan weren’t just limited to violent acts and intimidation. Many Klan members held roles in the authorities, or were part of citizen’s committees, who had control over
This was due to the policy of McCarthyism. Southern racists were among the most ardent anticommunists and tried their best to discredit the African-Americans with this theory. For example, this was evident in the late 1940’s when this principle lead to witch hunts where radical right wing opponents of Communism would regularly discriminate black people and used violence against them. This point supports the line of argument that there was little change between 1945-55 because of the huge influx of racial prejudice due to
Nelson Mandela and other nationalist leaders in Africa fought to repeal the apartheid, using civil disobedience and violence. The Indian and African fight for freedom in the 20th century had many similarities as well as differences, such as both India and Africa’s use of symbolic clothing and non-violent protests in civil disobedience movements. One similarity between the uses of civil disobedience in South Africa and India is the use of boycotting and hunger strikes. In India, Mahatma Gandhi went on hunger strikes for days; even weeks in order to further prove his dissatisfaction of a British occupied India. In 1989, African political prisoners went on hunger strikes.
To support his thesis Percy employs that there was numerous measures taken by the government to disrupt the Black Panther Party. In 1966 Black people did not have the rights white people had black people had to overcome so many obstacles to get where they are today. The Administrations Propaganda War against the Panthers Making the Political Criminal is basically about the White House having an Enemies list made up by the office of the Nixon administration this list contained political parties and organizations such as the Black Panther Party. The White House Administration was basically trying to sabotage their political enemies’ ones such as the Black Panther Party. The Superagency Approach to Crushing Dissent is involving the Federal Law Enforcement Agencies trying to accuse the Black Panther Party of illegal crimes and using narcotics, especially Newton.
Johnson’s responses to racial and gender discrimination were not as effective as he had hoped. Although he signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, he was confronted with violence and protests and African Americans creating new organizations such as the Black Panther Party. The Black Panther Party’s motive was to protect their families by carrying weapons legally, a right given by the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. However, this caused violence and many protests, such as in Watts, Los Angeles. African Americans were also hit hard by voting.
He delivered speeches that got his followers to build anger and not want a peaceful demonstration. Many viewed Malcom as an extremist and in his speeches he preached about separatism between blacks and whites. . The Civil Rights Movement was an era dedicated to activism for equal rights and fair treatment of African Americans in the United States. Rallies were held to end discrimination, segregation and to change the culture, political and social mind set of America.
It is this Committee that spoke on behalf of the movement as they were elites and needed to enlighten the community of the oppression they are undergoing. The Black Panthers movement was embraced by most of the people who felt oppressed such as the Blacks and the Puerto Rican young men and even the white revolutions which were against racial discrimination and in need to reform the American society. However, the movement was strongly resisted by the government and its agencies such as the police and the FBI who brutally abused the Panthers and mercilessly killed them (Reed, 57). The Police brutality was extreme that, the whole group was to be completely wiped out. The FBI achieved their goal by infiltrating the Movement through informants and using propaganda as a tool to cause division among the group’s leadership (Armstrong,
What is oppression? Oppression is forcing people to work without sufficient pay, or taking away their unalienable rights, or taking people into slavery. These are all examples of oppression that have happened to people thought history. When a large number of people are controlled and oppressed by a few, people resist and revolt. Therefore, in this case, the motivation for rebellion was oppression.