Try to change the behaviors of those they know are still committing crime that can lead others to this life in prison. But for some it does not matter what type of program they are in or standing in front of the judge telling them they have two strikes. Habitual offenders will continue to go through the system and end up overcrowding them because they just do not care, about their life or anyone else’s. So the “three strike law or habitual offender” needs to be tuff on crime and those who continue to abuse the
It has reduced state government costs, and reduced overcrowding prisons. Nonviolent offenders, can be punished in the community rather than in prison. It is in the community where they can make a difference, and at the same time be punished for their crimes. Reducing recidivism rates is a serious concern for corrections. If recidivism rates are not reduce, corrections will only grow because they are constantly taking on the same offenders.
Second that the criminals targeted by the improvements were dangerous people who must be incarcerated because lesser sanctions would not be effective in limiting the illegal behaviors. The Third mandatory prison sentences would reduce crime by incapacitating or discouraging the dangerous offenders who were targets of the improvements. With the carrying out of the improvements there was unique growth in the size of federal and state prison populations. Finally, the massive increases in incarceration that resulted from the improvements have been distributed unevenly throughout the population. In specific, there has been a geographical clustering of incarceration.
Intermediate Sanctions and Community Corrections Some of the benefits to intermediate sanctions include the correctional system being able to reduce the inmate population, provide inmates with the opportunity of a second chance, offering a wide range of rehabilitation/treatment programs, and being stricter in regards to supervision of the rules. The Negative effects of intermediate sanctions are there are not enough professionals to monitor offenders who are offered intermediate sanctions. Case loads for parole/probation officers remain high increasing the chance of an offender slipping through the cracks. Another negative effect is certain individuals are incarcerated as punishment instead of being granted an intermediate sanction. Sanctions require involvement, but they also allow officers the use of discretion.
Furthermore, social program budgets will also be drastically decreased if the bill is enacted. It’s ironic because the motives and the results seem to negate each other. With public safety and security as a priority, educating youth to keep them out of the prison system should be the primary goal. Providing healthcare professionals who can educate about proper effects and side effects of illicit drug use, which has proven to work, should be another measure. The funding which the government proposes we spend on tougher enforcement and longer, harsher prison terms could mean a much better education and healthcare system, and greater social benefit
Then it would be where the person itself would not be incarcerated but given help to change the outcomes of their thought so that the risk of them committing a crime is lowered. Which I somewhat agree with them; however I know some people can use that to their advantage to commit something and get away with it without the possibility of getting incarcerated. According to "Criminologist Believes Violent Behavior Is Biological" (2013), " if bad brains do cause bad behavior, if brain dysfunction raises the odds that somebody will become a criminal offender — a violent offender — and if the causes of the brain dysfunction come relatively early in life ... should we fully hold that adult individual responsible?” (para. 7). It was explained that there could be plenty of factors that go on when it comes to this kind of behavior which may include birth complications or things that someone was exposed to at a young age that could cause such a reaction to the mindset of
In cases where the primary reason for the offense is related to poverty or mental illness, in my opinion, the primary focus should be rehabilitation, as these offenders are less likely to repeat if they have what they need. Retribution is the one method that I feel really does not have a place in today’s society, if the court feels that the individual is beyond rehabilitation, then it is in societies best interest to protect it from that individual for as long as allowed by law. Deterrence can be a very effective method when trying to curb deviant behavior, but people must know how hard it is to get away with the criminal behavior, and how likely they are to be convicted if arrested, then it can be much more effective than just letting people stumble into the situation then finding out. Ultimately rehabilitation would be the ideal but not everyone can be rehabilitated and these people have to be punished in a way that lets others get the benefits of rehabilitation. References Forer, L. G. (1992).
b. Thesis statement: Legislation should focus on education and prevention since both methods are more effective than incarceration for youth offenders. c. Main points: i. Current practices of treating youth offenders as adults are not effective. ii. Treating youth offenders at the community level with education is a more effective way to reduce violent crime.
• The treatment provision in this bill is extremely important – studies show a large percentage of those incarcerated who need drug treatment do not receive such services. (2) Receiving drug treatment is an important component of staying crime and drug free once an individual has been released from prison or jail.” Hopefully in the near future things will change and people will be sentenced based on the crime and their part in it instead of mandatory sentencing which does not care about the
This means diverting less serious offenders to alternatives to prison. Many times this can be done under existing laws and regulation. Sometimes this requires legislation. Curtailing the requirement of pre-trial detention for minor crimes is one way to accomplish this. The second strategy is to reduce the time that offenders spend in prison.