Argument Essay: That we should use prison labor for public works; Affirmative team We should use prison labor for public works because it’s an additional punishment, it can also be an industry. Because of this it will help prisoners seek jobs with their skills and start a new life. In a way it’s a way that can re-educate prisoners; Prison labor assists prisoners in acquiring vocational skills and work ethic so that they can have post release employment. In a prison family, such as a criminal record of a family, a member of the family could break the circle so they wouldn’t be prisoners their whole life. Like what Xavier said in his argument, the government would wasting money on the prisoners, I believe that’s true the government is helping giving the prisoners a second chance and to be educated.
Overcrowding of our prisons is a bad situation that will continue to get worse unless our government figures out a solution. Inmates are at risk, correctional officers are at risk, and the American public is at risk. Without a solution soon, we will be seeing a large scale problem get much larger. Overpopulation is defined as “the condition of having a population so dense as to cause environmental deterioration, an impaired quality of life, or a population crash” (Webster, 2014). Today our prison system has fallen into a desperate time with overcrowding and overpopulation of our prisons county, state, and federal.
I can probably say there are a lot of problems with in a prison as in drugs, violence, gangs and overcrowding. Out of all of those things I believe the biggest issue facing the American correctional system is overcrowding. It wasn’t always an issue back in the day or if it was it’s probably not as bad as it is today. Overcrowding may not seem like a big issue but let’s take a look, what causes prison overcrowding? What does prison overcrowding cause?
One of the solutions to the ever-growing problem in the criminal justice system can be in the area of sentencing. State and local systems can develop appropriate programs that can be put in place as alternatives to incarceration. In many instances, “there are increased calls – in fact demands – for local officials to devise alternatives to incarceration (ATI) strategies and programs while at the same time maintain public safety” (The Regional Institute, 2007, p. 9). The development of alternative strategies can allow the system to function at a higher level while decreasing the inmate population and working to help an offender make a positive change for the future. The criminal justice system has a need for alternative to incarceration programs in order to help with the overcrowding and the task of reforming offenders at any level.
First I am going to talk about the supporters. They believe that all youth should be responsible for their actions. Their key arguments are: Stiffer charges will make the youths think twice before they do the crimes; this will lead to lower crime rates in future. Youths who commit crimes are sent to rehabilitation, while sometimes their victims are left to suffer forever. The youth’s age shouldn’t be a bias factor for receiving punishments.
Jennifer Walls Prison Overcrowdings One of the biggest issues facing the American correctional system is prison overcrowdings. Prisons all over the America have become so overcrowded that it’s affecting many. A lot of people think that overcrowded prisons affect the inmates, the guards and the system. Those are many that are affected by the overcrowdings, but this is not all. Little known, overcrowding of prisons affect the American people, our economy and our lives.
A "profile" is a coherent set of facts - known conditions and observable behavior that indicate a particular individual may be engaged in criminal activity. The technique of "profiling" is a well-known and long-standing law enforcement tactic. In fact racial profiling can make us less safe. Multiple studies have shown that when police focus on factors such as race, they tend to pay less attention to actual criminal behavior. This is a dangerous trend that can inhibit effective law enforcement and ultimately endanger the lives of all persons who depend on law enforcement for protection.
The majority of studies examining incapacitation effects demonstrate a small but positive effect in reducing crime. However, this crime prevention effect is associated with significant increases in prison populations. Crime can be reduced if the career criminals were identified and incapacitated. This selective incapacitation strategy would identify the offenders who were predicted to commit serious crimes at a higher rate so they could be incarcerated for long periods of
By dealing with the offenders through communication and education, we set ourselves apart from the local law enforcement. This not only allows for a more peaceful resolution, but it also reduces the amount of money the residents would have collect in order to pay the salary of the off duty officer we would need to patrol the community. Residents discovered that by rotating duties and shifts, everyone who wants to participate in the program has a chance to. Working together we are stronger than if we took it upon ourselves individually to confront the issues of crime we have in the community. Research has proven that by taking an active role in protecting our assets we have a better appreciation of not only the property we have, but the property of our community as a whole.
In the eyes of the general public, “once a criminal, always a criminal” but this is an unfair assumption to make. For years the getting tough on crime approach has been very popular among politicians because criminal activity is looked down upon by virtually everyone in society and politicians use this to try and gain support for their party. When you think about getting tough on crime, things like longer harsher sentences are ways to crack down on offenders but there is no real evidence that increasing the penalties for crimes actually works to prevent them from happening. Overall getting tough on crime does not work because harsher sentences do not impact criminals, it costs the tax payers a lot of money and our society today does nothing to prevent crime in the first place. The first reason why getting tough on criminals does not work is because for the most part, they are not deterred You must Login to view the entire essay.