Privacy Invaded Argumentative Essy

721 Words3 Pages
Privacy invaded? Ever since the NSA, National Security Agency, has started to track and scan citizen’s private phone calls and electronic messages people have been concerned about the privacy of their technology, they feel that it is a violation to their fourth amendment. People being watched and spied on for only a reason of suspicion; is a violation because the citizens have the right to a reasonable search and seizures. Therefore, I do not agree with the government unreasonably spying. The fourth amendment states guards against unreasonable searches and seizures. Search and seizure is a legal procedure used in many civil law and common law legal systems where by police or other authorities and their agents, who suspect that a crime has been committed, do a search of a person's property and confiscate any relevant evidence to the crime. First, I will cover the positives of the NSA looking into the citizen’s private belongings and how the federal government gets its information. “When required to comply with these requests, we deliver that information to the U.S. government — generally through secure FTP transfers and in person,” Google said in a statement. The forms they get the information to the U.S. government are: putting data onto a memory disk or external hard drive, or printing out the requested information for a federal official. Google says, FTP, also known as file transfer protocol, is an often used method for exchanging information between servers with extra security. By Google agreeing to this agreement the federal government can catch more criminals and terrorist. Next, I will cover one of our former presidents who believed in the NSA spying on our citizens. “President George W. Bush told CNN that National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden “damaged the country,” but defended the PRISM surveillance program that his administration

More about Privacy Invaded Argumentative Essy

Open Document