Laboratories were turned into cells by removing the doors, and a closet was turned into solitary confinement. Everything was videotaped in the “prison”, and there was an intercom system that allowed the researchers to listen to the “prisoners” conversations and allowed them to make announcements. There weren’t any windows, and all clocks were removed. This left the prisoners with nothing to try and decide how much time had passed. When the 24 boys arrived, there were no differences between the college boys.
The original role for prisons was just to hold criminals and no regard was given for an inmate’s well-being. These prisons were often overcrowded and dirty (2011). The welfare of the inmates did not seem to matter. As Roth states in the text “Contrary to existing penal protocol, Rush envisioned a prison system in which convicts were housed in a large building equipped with single cells to segregate the more dangerous and disruptive prisoners. All others were lodged in apartments” (2011, p. 89).
The Zimbardo Prison Study A person actually going insane from participating in a mock prison study! Wow, who would have thought that. In the beginning I think Zimbardo accomplished exactly what he sat out to do; He created a functional prison setting. These boys really had no idea what they had gotten themselves into. In an effort to make this experiment as real as possible, the college students were picked up by a police officer, read their rights and formally arrested, while neighbors watched in disbelief.
Assured, you can lock a child up for violence and take him off the streets, but then that just causes a domino effect. The child stays in prison until he is of legal age, gets out, and then goes about committing violent acts all over again. Today’s young adults are incapable of teaching their children right from
Lastly, the union argued that it was never viewed as a safety concern in the old building and shouldn’t be viewed as such in the new building. Management argued that the presence of the fridge in the building did not fall under Article VII. The company held fast to the fact that it was never maintained in a sanitary matter before and questioned that it would be now. While in the old location, management was hesitant to bring up the sanitary conditions because all the employees had chipped in to purchase it so it wasn’t company owned. The biggest concern was that the fridge was 10 years old and had to run through defrost cycles, especially in the summer months.
When they returned to the station, the two officers then shoved a wooden stick up Louima’s rectum, and also held it in his face. Louima who had nothing to do with knocking Volpe down, but he was arrested and tortured. The officers involved threatened Louima not to tell anyone and then tried to cover up their excessive use of force. This shows that Officer Volpe violated Brooklyn police codes on force, and Louima’s civil rights. Another article was in February 1999; Roy Lynn was attacked by a police dog.
Zimbardo-Stanford Prison Experiment The Stanford Prison Experiment was made because Zimbardo was interested in finding out whether the brutality reported among guards in American prisons was due to the sadistic personalities of the guards or had more to do with the prison environment. Since Zimbardo wanted the experiment to feel real, he had the students, who were assigned as prisoners, to be arrested at their own homes, without any warnings. They were first taken to a real jail where they were fingerprinted, photographed and “booked” before being blindfolded and taken to the “prison” where the experiment would take place. Each prisoner had their personal possessions removed and locked away; they were given prison clothes and were referred to by their number on their uniform. The Stanford Prison Experiment was a mock prison experiment where they had chosen 24 Male Students selected from the 75 who volunteered to join the experiment.
Philip Zimbardo actually played the role of the warden and looked over the behavior inside the prison. The Stanford experiment was originally supposed to last for 14 days but had to be cut short due to what was occurring inside the mock prison. The guards became abusive and the prisoners began experiencing stress and anxiety. The guards and prisoners were never instructed in how to behave and were left with that freedom. Instead of behaving in a positive manner the guards started to become aggressive and abusive towards prisoners and the prisoners started to become passive
The effect of social discrepancies was evident in Zimbardo’s prison experiment. In the experiment, average college students were chosen to play the roles of prison guards and prisoners for two weeks. Within a few days the superior guards began to abuse the prisoners. They stripped the prisoners naked, made them clean their toilets with their hands and sexually taunted them. (Zimbardo Ted Talks) This experiment has shown how average students can be driven to abuse their fellow citizens when they are in roles of superiority.
To what extent is human nature malleable? Does evil triumph over humanity or does humanity win over evil? The Stanford Prison Experiment, known as one of the most notorious experiments in the study of human psychology, was conducted at Stanford University in 197l. Philip Zimbardo, a psychology professor, and a team of researchers wanted to study the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. Twenty-four undergraduate male students out of over 75 were selected to play randomly assigned roles of prisoners and guards in a mock prison located in the basement of the Stanford psychology building.