Roger Scholfield was opened to new ways to promote his business but he did not want to risk his company, promoting an impractical vehicle to the regular consumer, but offering the vechicle to corporate and his fleet in the community he started a good line of going green. 3. Should the government regulate companies’ claims that their products are green? Should official classifications for environmental friendliness be defined? Yes, It's the great importante for many company to minimise the impact that their products have on the environment ,but it's totally unacceptable for companies to make false claims.
By doing this, he will not only have to work for a company he dislikes, he will save a lot of lives as well since nobody is going to be smoking Greyarea’s product anymore due to discontinuity. This will also lead to a better and happier society, and that is what utilitarianism is all about. As for being a Deontologist, according to The History of Utilitarianism of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, the word deontology comes from the Greek word deon, meaning “duty.” Deontology is the normative ethical position that judges the morality of an action based on the action’s adherence to a rule or rules. It is the ethics of duty where morality is duty-based. If Fred was a deontologist, then he would have no choice but to keep doing the assignments that were assigned to him by the company he is working for because that is his job and he is obligated to them no matter the
Unit 6. Assignment 1. Cable Testers Anthony Gamboa Michael Galindo NT1310: Physical Networking ITT Technical Institute February 10, 2014 It looks like the cable installation went wrong when the so-called professionals tried to install a new cable system. The best way to address a faulty cable installation is to avoid the problems in the first place by purchasing high quality components and installing them carefully. Even though having the best equipment for the job sounds like a good thing, but no matter how carful the installation process is; problems are always going to appear.
In his thinking, it did not matter that there was no scientific evidence. The fact that there is no scientific evidence linking serious health problems to DDT contamination also proves that there is so evidence to the contrary. What really sets the Triana lawsuit apart from the others, was a plan proposed by Foster. He wanted to protect the people of Triana from any negative affects of DDT in the present and in the future, so he proposed that Olin establish a healthcare program for all residents that were exposed to DDT. In addition, the lawsuit would also require Olin to compensate the plaintiffs for their loss of income.
At this time, I could not conclusively say yes or no to allowing fracking in the U.S. 2. Should certain regulations be put in place? Yes, regulations are typically made to protect all facets of a business, especially one where the environment is involved. Though we know from past experience that regulations can often go the way of the highest bidder in some instances, if the oil and gas companies stay true to what they are trying to accomplish with fracking they most certainly can protect themselves as well as the environment they plan to utilize. 3.
The new vision statement has greater detail but doesn’t mention what we want to be. The new vision statement should not be labeled vision statement; we should break down the vision statement into the mission, vision and core values. Our core values are producing quality products for our customers, an extremely safe work place and to protect not pollute our environment. The first item mentioned on new vision statement is safety. HSPP’s big commitment is to have a safe work place and a goal of zero incidents.
One of the remaining ethical issues and the one that gives pause to stakeholders about the viability of GM products is the possible harm to human health. Since it is a new possibility, the attainable consequences are not yet to be seen. To prevent potential damaged, Hugh Grant –current CEO– focused Monsanto’s biotechnology in products that would not be served directly at the dinner plate. Several important decisions in the matter of ethics and health have been taken to provide security to stakeholders so they can believe Monsanto’s reliability. Also, many charitable actions show that what the company is looking for is a social commitment to improve live conditions and to give more opportunities to do well.
I also chose to follow the recommendations from Uma Gardener, to buy the customized movement holders because this is another way to improve accuracy of the watches in different positions, and to upgrade the timing machine because this would help control accuracy while assembling the watches. The only recommendation I chose not to follow was from Amanda Hamilton, she wanted to buy a deep water simulation machine because she thought this would be another avenue the company could take for new advertising. I chose not to follow this recommendation because even though it sounded like a good idea, I did not think it was needed right now. I did not see how this would help us reach our goal of improving accuracy of the watches in different positions. I thought it would
What is Scholfield Honda's primary ethical responsibility in situations where a proposed green initiative is cost-prohibitive or even detrimental to the company's bottom line? The main responsibility here was to his company, to make sure that it remained financially stable. The “Green” effort was secondary to his ethical responsibility. The option of promoting the natural gas vehicles to his corporate and fleet consumers allowed him to not only protect the foundation of his business of selling vehicles to public consumers, but to also allow him another market completely without risking his established business. Should the government regulate companies' claims that their products are green?
Disposal techniques such as burning and using dumpsites only push the environment further down the drain (Logomasini, 1); since such waste disposal methods bring about environmental concerns as well. Governments have recycling directives in place but companies and individuals are still having the liberty to recycle the waste on their own, and this is where the government directives get overlooked. Disposing biodegradable waste is not as challenging as other waste that naturally decomposes leaving organic benefits to the environment. That being the case, therefore, it means that non-biodegradable waste poses a massive challenge to conservation efforts making it essential to come up with an effective and comprehensive recycling mechanism. This exploratory argumentative paper will delve deep into the case of why recycling the non0biodegradeable waste should be made mandatory by the government for all private individuals and corporate entities to comply with.