The Tsar himself was responsible for the fall of the Romanovs in 1917, mostly due to how he was not suited to the role as the Tsar. This was due toAYASHA IMRAN and start a revolution. Nicholas II dissolved the Duma and introduced bread rationing which caused families at home to suffer and strikes and demonstration increased due to tsars rationing threats, working conditions and inflation. The Tsar did not do anything successful to stop these strikes or to stop the inflation. His tactics were wrong which caused himself the responsible for the fall of the Romanovs in 1917.
A key long term factor that resulted in huge repercussions in Russia's was Imperialism. Like all European powers of the time Russia was expanding in size, population and power. Whilst doing vast numbers of nationalities, peoples, cultures and religions were made part of Russia and faced the harsh realities of Russification. This repression of key aspects of Individuality and freedoms caused much discontent which ultimately turned bloody against their "Little Father". The act of rising up against repression isn't a modern Idea, Islam and Christianity fought for similar reasons.
Therefore many had returned from the war only to then find that they had lost their jobs as well, so they directed their anger towards the new government who had signed the treaty. In conjunction with this, the majority of those returning from the front kept their weapons due to poor organisation, which led to the creation of the Freikorps. Armed and and angry with the new government, they were poised to take the country by force if it was not for the Ebert-Groener 1918 whereby Ebert promised to protect the status of those in the army and give them supplies, if they prevented other uprisings. This showed how fragile the
The war caused a great deal of problems for the government, originally they had announced that their involvement would be entirely defensive but were pressured into an offensive battle by the Allies. This greatly angered the already the de-moralised soldiers, due to conscription the army was made up of mainly peasants who weren’t trained to fight and wanted to return home and gain more land for themselves. The June Offensive, which was put in place with the hope that a victory would strengthen moral, did the exact opposite. Far from strengthening Russian army morale, this offensive proved that Russian army morale no longer existed. No Russian general could now count on the soldiers under his command actually doing what they had been ordered to do.
However his policies were still very limiting as they did not address the backwardness of agriculture and caused frequent famines, leading to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people; keeping Russia economically and socially far behind the great European powers. Witte ensured the construction of the trans-Siberian railway in an attempt to achieve economic modernisation; this would run for 7000 kilometres across the empire from St Petersburg to Vladivostok on the Pacific Ocean. This enterprise would require a colossal feat of engineering; and would revolutionise Russia’s transport system, it would require huge sums of money beyond the domestic means of the Russian economy; to overcome this Witte acquired loans from western and central Europe, ensuring the railway was properly funded. The railway allowed peasants to migrate to developing towns and farm on new lands mitigating ‘Land Hunger’ making Russia one step closer to industrialisation. The railway gave Russia access to Siberia and its vast resources such as coal, oil and metal ores these were considered ‘capital goods’ and led to a 50% economic growth; However still trailing far behind the great European powers such as Austro-Hungary which had a 79% increase.
It could be argued that in the pursuit of power and wealth neither ideology nor necessity drove the Ancient Romans to war but rather the simple fact that expansion in territory, control of other peoples and the increase of wealth as a consequence of that expansion made the ruling elite and the Emperors power hungry. Ancient Rome was one of the largest empires in the ancient world. It covered vast amounts of square kilometres and had a population of approximately 90 million people. This vast territory and enormous population made Ancient Rome very powerful. However in an empire as vast as the Ancient Roman was, both ideology and necessity contributed to some of the wars that were fought in particular in the more remote or wild areas in the Western part of the Empire.
The people of Germany already resented the papacy because it exploited Germany economically as it was one of the richest, most urbanised and educated parts of Europe, extracting the largest sums from the ruling families. By 1500, England, France and
"(iranvision.com) Darius's words affected many people and it proved how great he was. In his life he achieved alot by his reforms, Darius was from a noble family and he went through many wars because he wanted more powers and lands, after his death Persian Empire was an empire that couldn't be compared to any other empires. Himself knew about all his talent so he curved on one of the biggest stone " My body is strong. As a fighter of battles I am a good fighter of battles. [...] I am skilled both in hands and in feet.
How far do you agree that the most important result of the oppression was the strengthening of Stalin’s political dominance? The Great Terror had a profound effect upon the Communist Party and on Soviet society as a whole and it was most famous aspect of Stalin’s Russia. This terror grew from his paranoia and desire to be the absolute leader, and was enforced by the NKVD as well as his public show-trials. It developed into a terrifying system of labour camps (or gulags) and purges. Stalin’s oppression had many results including, but not limited to, the strengthening of his political dominance.
Each of these problems snowballed into the revolution of March 1917, resulting in the Tsar stepping down. From the very beginning, Tsar Nicholas was unwilling and unprepared to rule. Not only the Tsar, but the ministers that made up the government were inexperienced, the majority of them having not set foot in parliament before. He wanted autocracy, which is a government run by a singular person with unlimited authority. He firmly believed that democracy (government that has supreme power vested in the people and their elected representatives) would lead to the collapse of Russia.