Natural Crime and Legal Crime

1707 Words7 Pages
Natural Crime and Legal Crime There are natural crimes and legal crimes in civilized society. All crimes committed are different in their own way. While they are all crimes in regards to local, state or federal laws they are considered differently by those who are supposed to represent and obey them. Some crimes are very violent while others are simply a means to an end. On the other hand, other crimes are thought of as less important while some other crimes are labeled wrong despite whom the witness might be. The natural definition of crime is any act that is seen as “fundamentally wrong, strongly disapproved, and deserving of punishment,” regardless of whether it is legal (Robinson, 2005). Natural crimes are crimes that are morally and ethically wrong and would be wrong no matter what the law says about them, while legal crimes are the type of crimes that are simply illegal due to the government labeling them as such. Murder is a crime that everyone can see is wrong disregarding how a person may look at it but drug abuse can be thought of as to only hurt the person doing it. One must remember that laws were created to make sure people are safe and secure despite how they may feel about the laws and that laws are meant to forbid anything that can be deemed wrong. As stated before, natural crimes are crimes that are morally and ethically wrong. Natural crimes are associated with mala in se, or wrong in itself. This means that it is known as being wrong regardless of the circumstances and that one should know not to commit such acts. Part one offenses of the FBI’s crime index can be considered mala in se. The seven Part one offense classifications included the violent crimes of Murder and non-negligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, and the property crimes of burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft. By congressional

More about Natural Crime and Legal Crime

Open Document