Myths: Potentials and Limitations

3223 Words13 Pages
Myths: Potentials and Limitations It is argued that in order to perform the nation, myths are indispensable as they are expressive of “mutuality, reflectiveness and solidarity of togetherness” (Habib 22). Roland Barthes states that “myth is not false so much as it is a reworking of ‘historical reality’” (qtd. in Habib 20). Therefore, myths can then be understood as “creative productions of history” (Habib 5). Because myths are linked historically not just to literature, but also to the experience of the sacred, their use has the effect turning an experience sacrosanct (Clasby xi). The two texts, Wild Thorns and Waltz with Bashir: A Lebanon War Story are imbued with various myths, of heroism and martyrdom, nation and national identity, and the motherland and revolution. Though the myths in the story are born out of a historical and political necessity to create a unified community, the same myths are also far removed from the lived experience, often alienating characters instead, and limiting the exploration of different possibilities and interpretations of history and nation. Myths, as the chosen form of communication of “prophets, poets and rebels” (Clasby xv), offer a symbolic language for articulating experience that can be used as a narrative of the experience of a people. In the light of the fact that many scholars see “modern consciousness” as a fall grace (Clasby 1), myths elevate the ordinary experience to the sacred (Clasby xi). One nationalist poem from Wild Thorns speaks of Palestine in such terms, “My homeland, part of heaven/Your name is like a prayer on my lips” (Khalifeh 124). Myths demand that in order to avoid the death of the soul and to access a transformation that will bring harmony, one must no longer cling to the ordinary experience. It so becomes that a rejection of its call is to remain in a “meager adolescent world” (Clasby 5). For
Open Document