Moral vs Influence: Hucks Journey

858 Words4 Pages
Moral vs Influence: Huck's journey “How can a society that debases human lives on a mass scale consider itself civilized?” This comes from an article, Twain in 85 by Shelly Fishkin, that articulated the irony of the morals of civil society as a whole. It directly criticizes racism which was not “allowed” because slavery was considered justifiable. Mark Twain, originally named Samuel Clemens, was one of the few who questioned the morals and ideas of society because he believed that they weren't right. He used Adventures of Huckleberry Finn to characterize the irony he saw in societies clashing standards that decided slavery as right but thought that every human had inalienable rights such liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Huck's moral and the development of that moral is advanced through Jim's search for freedom where it can be seen him growing as a person by accepting Jim, a slave, and the stages of his development: absence of morality and clashes of societies standards with his own. Irony and hypocrisy are themes throughout the text which show the morals of society and Hucks own feeling toward them. Huck isn't a believer of religion and is skeptical of what Ms.Watson tries to teach him because he has tried praying many times and it was unsuccessful in fulfilling what he wanted. Because of that he is unaware of the moral fundamentals of right and wrong that religion carry. In the book he states " well I wouldn't see any advantage in going where she was going... I asked if she reckoned Tom Sawyer would go there and she said not by a considerable sight. I was glad about that because I wanted him and me to be together"(13). In this statement Huck says that he doesn't want to go where Ms.Watson will go because he didn't think anything good would come out of it. He would rather go to hell and be damned as long as he had Tom with him. This is a highlighting of
Open Document