They both are used to track soldiers and equipment processed in and out the combat zones. The goal of EMILPO is to provide the Army with a reliable, timely, and efficient mechanism for managing the total strength accountability and performing personnel actions for soldiers all around the world. The system provides visibility of the location, status, and skills of soldiers both from a high level and a unit level. This visibility is crucial in determining the war fighting capability of the Army and its subordinate commands. This visibility is also vital in determining the strength and capability of the Army and subordinate commands within the Army.
In order to do this, it is imperative that the sustainment community focus on supporting decisive action (offensive, defensive, and stability operations), but also ensure that sustainment personnel are adaptable and flexible to be able to support a range of differing mission types. Specifically, this implies that the force structure and equipment of sustainment units should be focused on decisive action with the necessary protection, mobility, firepower, and communications to enable effective sustainment of the supported combat organization. Sustainment leaders must be trained in, understand, and be capable of executing differing sustainment missions, such as BPC and HA/DR missions. When this training, education and experience in sustainment leaders is matched with world class organizational structures and equipment, sustainment organizations will be able to readily adapt to a range of missions. People Leader Attributes.
The importance of following the rules and chain of command of the military The Chain of Command is the lifeblood of the avail. It is the course of communications that has the military one working as a team: information goes up the Chain, and Commands and Instruction go down the Chain. It is also the Order of the actions of the Unit. Without a working Chain of Command, a unit will have its member’s pregnancy to all directions, doing all kinds of things and getting nowhere. Without a chain of command, each military member would have no remote idea on what to do to accomplish a certain task.
It may be helpful to think of these as internal and defining qualities possessed all the time. As defining qualities, they make up the identity of the leader. The knowledge that leaders should use in leadership is what Soldiers and Army civilians KNOW. Leadership requires knowing about tactics, technical systems, organizations, management of resources, and the tendencies and needs of people. Knowledge shapes a leader’s identity and is reinforced by a leader’s actions.
As well as all this, William had a store of the finest weapons in France. Leadership William was one of the bravest people of his time. When his army was having difficulties during the battle, he bravely led his army back up the hill to make another attack upon the English. Due to William's intelligence, he arranged his army in long rows, archers at the front to try and soften up the English's shield wall, foot-soldiers in the middle, and the cavalry at the back for a big attack.The retreating trick explained in the above paragraph also shows great leadership. Luck Luckily for William, the wind changed direction in his favour on his journey north to England.
The impression given in Source 1 is that the battle was a ‘disaster’ and the army was very brave and courageous. Source 1 explains how the British army had ‘the most brilliant valour’ whilst fighting against they’re ‘savage and barbarian enemy’. The impression given of Russian army was that they were almost undefeatable as savage and barbarian are very powerful words. The source also emphasises the chivalry of the army and how they followed the code of conduct ‘on the best days of chivalry’. In this essay I will explain how Sources 2 and 3 support this impression given and also how they challenge it.
He did a very good job on his presidency and he had many important achievements. I would definitely have voted for Jefferson because he was brilliant and he understood the needs of the people. As mentioned above, he helped to write the Declaration of Independence and the constitutional law. Lastly, he argued fundamentally that a federal government that had too much authority over its people would ultimately undergo a revolution. Work Cited Ambrose, Stephen E. “Undaunted Courage: Meriwether Lewis, Thomas Jefferson, and the Opening of the American”, West.
Beowulf retained his wealth though triumphs in battles. Material wealth was a sign of fame to Anglo-Saxons. Fame was important to Anglo-Saxons because their fame temporarily defeated their fate, therefore, making fame a lifetime goal. Beowulf received lucrative treasures after vanquishing his opponents. For instance, after the battle with Grendel’s mother, Beowulf acknowledged his surroundings where he explained, “the monsters’ hall was full of rich treasures,” (lines 568-569).
Once a hero, always a hero “Taken warriors in their strength and led them.” - Rosie the Riveter or the one and only Beowulf? Line eight hundred and twenty six demonstrates the common ground between the hero of the Geats and lantern of American women, one invincible and highly destructive, the other lighting the way into the courageous positions the characters of the 1940's sought. Annihilation, destruction, and bloodshed, oh my! The Anglo-Saxon society thrived on warfare. Battles were on top of the list to determine one's character and will power.