Seriously.’ Dave Hollander tries to persuade the reader that golf shouldn’t be a sport. He goes to the point where he says, “A sport requires athleticism. Athletes are people who demonstrate superior physical skill in the areas of strength, agility and stamina.”(Hollander) The source is set up like a newspaper and has categories. The website shows a page of info. Hollander uses personal experiences, inferences, and observations to explain and persuade the reader to believe that golf shouldn’t be a sport.
All humanistic studies are conducted unscientifically. This is a strength of this is that they are less artificial in the way they conduct their studies, this in turn makes the tests more ecologically valid. However a weakness of this is that they have no objective results and they are unable to control variables. This makes causality harder to establish and means psychologists are unable to predict what is going to happen. The humanistic approach represents the ‘healthy half of psychology’ and suggests that we are all with good intentions.
Jenkins, on the other hand, says that Grossman's view only works if "we remove training and education from a meaningful cultural context, we assume learners have no conscious goals and that they show no resistance to what they are being taught, and we assume that they unwittingly apply what they learn in a fantasy environment to real world spaces." He also says that children are not desensitized by video games and understand the difference between realworld and play. "Play allows kids to express feelings and impulses that have to be carefully held in check in their realworld interactions." Jenkins makes some pretty valid points, and I agree with his argument more than Grossman's. I agree with Jenkins when he says children learn the difference between real shootings and video game death.
In the trait centred view, ‘psychologists would agree that the motivated behaviour is largely determined by personality, needs and goals of the athlete, exerciser or employee’ (Weinberg and Gould, cited in Rea, 2009, p.79). The trait centred view, however, doesn’t take the situation and environment into consideration. It assumes that a person will be motivated the same regardless of their environment. This might be the case with some
Ender’s Game Essay In Ender’s Game, the colonel comments that Ender wins thoroughly. This is a sufficient explanation for why Ender hurts people, because when someone wins thoroughly, the person does not have to worry about fighting anymore, and Ender does not like to fight. Ender does not turn to others for help because he believes that nobody is going to be there to help him, because they know they are trying to make him stronger. Ender is not a killer, he just tries his best to win his battles in one, and in every fight he gets placed in, he does not know that he killed his enemy, it is only afterwards that he finds out. In the schoolyard, when Ender is fighting Stilson and knocks him down, he decides to “win it now, and for all
A second-order violation is a desire that a first order desire would be one's will. If I desire, not just a desire to work out but that desire to work out rather than eat a cookie be effective in bringing one to workout rather than eat a cookie. It is in having second-order volitions that Frankfurt regards as essential to being a person. A wanton is an agent without a second order volitions. They are beings with first order desires but they don't care about their desires.
This also allows him to present his thesis, “Another huge problem, and one that is really our personal responsibility, is our lack of exercise and physical activity. Physical exercise is one place where we truly can make a difference in our lives.” His thesis is effective in a way that he builds ethos by how he says that it is “our” responsibility. He doesn’t direct this at the readers as if he is not one of them. He acknowledges that he is one of us and this is a “we” thing. He tells the reader that he is just as responsible for his own physical activity as everyone else.
Sportsmanship means winning without gloating, losing without complaining, and treating your opponents, coaches, and the officials with respect. "Players should stick to the rules and concentrate on playing the game rather than making hurtful comments. You're out there to play, not to dance around
If you are out-going, be out-going. If you are quiet, be quiet. Don't try to be like some famous coach that you idolize. Without any doubt, there may be many excellent ideas and qualities that we can or should learn from successful coaches, but combining them into your own philosophy? Whatever your style is, be agreeable with that and, without adjusting your principles, be someone
Once they reach that point, the bodybuilders come to a realization that steroids or any physical enhancing chemical is not needed. In my opinion the body builder’s trainer should try to keep those chemicals away from the athlete and should never impulse nor comment on ever cheating by taking steroids. But in the end steroids are up to the individual and nobody else. In my opinion everyone should have a right to do whatever they wish to their body. The community cannot tell an individual what to do.