It has been stated that the very success of the Roman Republic in war and imperial expansions led to its defeat. While this statement makes several valid points, it is likely that numerous other facets functioned in the fall of the Republic---especially that of Senatorial corruption and its ensuing lack of popularity. Gradually and with little warning, the surface of Roman life as a Republic began to transform at a rate that threatened the very fabric of the governing body. With the commencement of the second Punic war, a great disproportion of wealth grew evident. Whereas prior most plebeians were farmers or laborers who owned small but significant portions of property or earned adequate payment for their toils, upon the second Punic War, Hannibal destroyed this land, leaving plebeians homeless with little source of income.
The Senate of Rome had most control over the citizens. Han China did not allow lower class citizens to have a say on how the empire was ruled; while, Imperial Rome had a senate to represent their plebeian’s or ordinary people. Another difference between the Han China and Imperial Rome was that the emperor of Han China had been chosen through the family and the citizens of Imperial Rome chose their ruler. Han China and Imperial Rome emphasized territorial expansion in both of their societies. They perceived threats to security; this led to war and then increased the length of border.
Trading and marketing flourished, while small enterprises became large ones. Overall, things were getting bigger and better, and since they were improving, there came a population boom that lasted into the 1600s. Then, disasters struck. Famines, droughts, epidemics, and other disasters led to a period of a dramatic decline (‘black economy’) in population and commerce and industry. At the same time, their government was expanding rapidly, leading to more drain on the economy and expansions people couldn’t pay.
They prefer to work in their accustomed ways. When people are confronted with the GGOL, they may think that they will shift from the environment they are habituated to. This thought will result in resistance to change. Thirdly,economic factors also trigger resistance to change. GGOL is ambiguous to most employees and managers at Simmons.
The Fall of Rome: Lessons to Learn Name Class Date Historians and scholars often disagree about what caused the fall of Rome. Upon analyzing the evidence, one can conclude that it was not one catastrophic event that caused the undoing of the Empire. It was a slow decline over the course of many years accelerated after the death of Marcus Aurelius A.D 180 and had many factors involved(Roman Empire). These different factors include economic woes, the influx of foreign immigrants/barbarians which led to perpetual warfare, the failure of government and its “elitist” or autocratic tendencies, and the general apathetic attitudes of the populace who had lost confidence in themselves and the state refused to take responsibility. One can draw parallels between these factors and the American society today and we should learn from the history of Rome so as not to follow the same path.
Due to this debt the government then resulted in printing money and this resulted in inflation. Inflation destroyed savings of the middle class and especially effected land owners as they relied on rent. State employees and factory workers purchasing power fell by 25% because of the value of the Iire. The state also spent 148 billion lire on the war effort and inflation increased with the price index quadrupling, and rising from 100 in 1914 to 413 in 1918. Conscription soaked up rural unemployment and some peasants grew prosperous.
In my opinion, this government wasn’t very fair because not everyone had the chance to voice their opinion. The Roman republic was maintained by the plebeians and the patricians giving them a not fair but very strong structure of government.
The decline of Rome was not very surprising. The Roman empire is the most talked about empire in history. This means that the decline shouldn't surprise anyone, because empires that big are expected to fall sooner or later. The weak army, the infrastructure, Invaders, were just some of the reasons of the decline of the Roman empire. Rome was falling to its knees.
To what extent was collectivization a success? Collectivization was a process which meant that small farms joined together to create larger farms in order to improve efficiency, another reason for it was to destroy the Kulaks. Stalin wanted to gain control over the countryside, this give him the ability to fulfill this, finally collectivization was used to increase the production of grain to sell to foreign countries. . Stalin achieved most of his aims; Grain production rose to nearly 100 million tones in 1937, although the numbers of animals never recovered.
The Fall of The Roman Empire The Roman Empire was once the world’s most powerful and prosperous empires of its time. It thrived in every aspect that an empire needs to run successfully. They lived in peace for nearly two centuries that they called Pax Romana. During the third century, the Roman Empire began to decline in drastic ways that would soon lead to its destruction. Many have come to the question: What were the contributing factors to the fail of the Roman Empire?