Lynn Valley Field Trip Lab Report

2449 Words10 Pages
Zoe Jones Geography 417 M. Schmidt, B. Heung March 15, 2013 Lynn Valley Field Trip Abstract: This lab was conducted to observe and classify the soil profiles of Lynn Canyon as well as to observe anthropogenic impacts on the area, particularly soil erosion. Two sites were selected; site one was located off- trail on a flat area, and site two was located on the lower slope close in proximity to the river. Through collecting samples, observations on site and analysis in the lab, the soil profile on site one was determined to be a humo-ferric podzol, and the soil profile at site two was determined to be a young regosolic soil. Introduction: Lynn Canyon reflects an important biogeoclimatic zone and it is important to classify the soils within…show more content…
This was inferred as the site was a flat area, not a floodplain, was not fine in particle size, here was no water table or mottles present and the particle size was coarse. The moisture regime of 4 is Mesic which is when water is slowly lessens in comparison with delivery, however the soil may remain wet depending on climate. Class 5 is subhygric, which is when moisture is removed very slowly, enough to keep soil wet soil moisture regime classes (MOF, 1999). The soil nutrient regime was determined to be poor to moderate which is a bit surprising as the soil had a thick forest floor and appears to host a variety of organisms, however when there is abundant vegetation, the majority of the soil nutrients will be taken up by the vegetation and the soil itself contains less. This classification could also be due to the eluviated A horizon and illuviation in the Bf horizon. The humus form was determined to be a mor, the particle size was coarse and the soil was relatively light coloured with no soil colluvial and dark color. The forest floor class for site 1 was determined to be a mor, specifically a hemimor as decaying wood occupied less that 35% organic matter and the F horizon was greater than 50% of F and H horizons. The forest floor had distinct, clear boundaries with the forest floor measuring at 11cm with a thick H layer, very greasy and dark and containing high amounts of visible mycelia, which is common in more…show more content…
The vegetation for our general study site was comprised of Douglas fir, hemlock and cedar with salal and ferns. Douglas Fir is not shade tolerant and therefore only occupied areas with available sunlight. Hemlock and cedar are shade tolerant and so compose the majority of the canopy as they can be in shade, allowing the D-firs to occupy light. Salal is a sign of slightly acidic soil and is allelopatric, which means that it can chemically affect other conifers negatively and use all the nutrients (DNV, 2010). There were mostly steep slopes with coarse woody debris greater than 7cm in diameter. This coarse woody debris provides nursery habitat for new growth as well as nutrients, although low in woods, to the soil. Also found was huckleberry which is also indicative of acidic soils, and some small patches of ivy (invasive). Most of the trees in the area were estimated to have been cut for cedar shingles approximately 90 years ago. There were large mounds of fallen trees that have been decomposing, often felled by wind throw. It takes these mounds a very long time to decompose and are called ‘pits’ or ‘mounds’. As seen particularly in site 1, coniferous dominated areas tend to harbor high amount of fungi that decompose old wood and lignin rich debris that falls to the forest floor. This decomposition frees nutrients by making them

More about Lynn Valley Field Trip Lab Report

Open Document