Lord of the Flies: A Tale of Good Versus Evil

1894 Words8 Pages
Every human being does things in their lives that can clearly be defined as good or bad. One must ask themselves: do these actions define who they are and state whether they are good or evil? In the novel the Lord of the Flies, author William Golding presents the idea that evil is in fact innate in all human beings. He states that whether or not they show these tendencies depends on the sort of society they belong to. While the truth of this statement is debatable, I believe that your actions are not what defines you; it is the society you belong to that determines your actions. Throughout the novel, Golding shows a progression in the boys’ behaviour from well-behaved, civilized English boys to evil, wild savages. Once the boys land on the island, they begin to become more crazed and less civilized. This is a product of the society they belong to, not the evil that is deep inside them. Since the boys are still relatively young when they crash on the island they lack a certain level of adult maturity; without any sort of adult authority figure, they are more inclined to be out of control. One thing Simon realizes towards the end of the novel is that the beast and the fear and evil it represents is actually a product of the boys’ own minds. This shows that it is not evil which is inside them, but a manufactured evil and fear towards a figure - in this case the “beast”. At the end of the day, they are still boys and the evil which Golding talks about is really just the boys’ minds corrupted by the island and the beast inside them. At the beginning of the novel the boys assemble and decide on the sort of society they want to build. They decide on rules and laws that they must abide by in order to keep this society running well. Even Jack, the antagonist of the story, initially felt the importance of upholding a lawful society: “We’ve got to have rules and obey
Open Document