Course Project Marie Parker MGMT 597 - Business Law Professor Tracy Phillips I choose to complete my course project on chapter 14, using the Statute of Frauds case against Hoffman and Sun Valley Company. “Case 14.1 - Statute of Frauds Fritz Hoffman and Fritz Frey contracted the Sun Valley Company (Company) about purchasing a 1.64-acre piece of property known as the “Ruud Mountain Property,” located in Sun Valley, Idaho, from Company. Mr. Conger, a representative of Company, was authorized to sell the property, subject to the approval of the executive committee of Company. Conger reached an agreement on the telephone with Hoffman and Frey, whereby they would purchase the property for $90,000, payable at 30 percent down, with the balance to be payable quarterly at an annual interest rate of 9.25 percent. The next day, Hoffman sent Conger a letter confirming the conversation.
Cruz’s parents notified Fagor of the incident by e-mail that same day that is occurred. Fagor forwarded the complaint to its insurance broker who forwarded it to Fagor’s general liability insurer. The insurance company notified Cruz on June 2, 2003 that it was not assuming
BUS 300 Week 4 Assignment 1 – Developing a Public Relations Plan, Part 1 – Strayer Latest Purchase here: https://www.homework.services/shop/bus-300-week-4-assignment-1-developing-a-public-relations-plan-part-1-strayer-latest/ Assignment 1: Developing a Public Relations Plan, Part 1 Research a nonprofit organization that has faced a public relations crisis within the past few years. Imagine that you were employed at this nonprofit at the time of the crisis and were tasked by the Board of Directors to develop a public relations plan to persuade the public that the facts of the matter are not as bad as what has been reported in the media. Write a 4-5 page paper in which you: 1. State the name of the organization and describe what its mission and purpose. 2.
“BTT was interested in distributing Strat and entered into an agreement with Chou whereby BTT paid him $25,000 in exchange for exclusive negotiation rights for a 90-day period” (Melvin, 2011, p. 155). This is a unilateral contract where BTT paid Chou $25,000 in exchange for one performance, which is the exclusive negotiation rights. “Just three days before the expiration of the 90-day period, the parties reached an oral distribution agreement at a meeting” (Melvin, 2011, p. 194). Both parties took part in an oral contract, later a confirmation of the agreement was sent via email. The confirmation included price, time frames, and obligations from both parties.
To begin with this report we will first provide the description of the term Internal Controls, what it consists of, its components and procedures. Next we will provide you with important information about the new regulations and provisions required by the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), which will be needed to be implemented for the company to go public. Our consideration of LBJ’s internal controls was designed to identify all qualities and deficiencies in internal controls that might be significant to the business operations. During our analysis we did identify some deficiencies in the current internal controls that we consider to be weaknesses that are important to be addressed. Purpose of this Report The purpose of this report is to describe the scope of our evaluation of LBJ’s internal controls and compliance and the results of that evaluation.
Running Head: Unit 4 Seminar Alternative Assignment Unit 4 Seminar Alternative Assignment Chastity Blickenstaff Kaplan University CJ-233-Intro to Forensic Psychology June 12, 2012 Professor Cooper Unit 4 Seminar Alternative Assignment What are some possible scenarios in which morality and legality might come in conflict? In order to answer that question I think that we need to first look at what morality and legality are. Morality as defined by Professor Cooper during the unit 4 seminar is the conformity to ideals of right human conduct (2012). Legality is the, “attachment to or observance of law” (Merriam, 2012). Many issues can cause ones morals to come is conflict with the law.
By law, the professional may be required to break this agreement in severe circumstances. The professional wants to make sure you the client know that in order to maintain their trust, the professional will try every step to talk to you about the situation, before taking further action. Tara soft Vs. The Board of Regents of the University of California Based on the law of Tara soft, confidentiality agreements has been altered to include those of the client, the professional, the agency, and anyone else involved within the case. Tara soft made it so there can be some liability on professional.
6:14-15). And finally, both parties are to be submitted to one another (Eph. 5:22-33). In the Old Testament a groom did not possess his wife until the bride price was paid (Gen. 34:12). Prior to this the bride and groom were betrothed in a legally binding contract which lasted for a year in which they were to remain celibate (Matt.
Challenges of Advocator and Mediator University of Phoenix BSHS/442 Advocacy and Mediation Terry Burgett October 16, 2011 Fred Oskin Challenges of Advocator and Mediator Advocating and Mediating are essential positions within the human services field as well as within many types of businesses. Dealing with individuals and groups provide a wide variety of perspectives and opinions that produce conflicts. Advocators provide assistance by providing another voice to a party involved in a conflict and a mediator provides assistance as a neutral voice to a party involved in a conflict. Many issues that can arise when an individual is both an advocate and a mediator involve ethics, morals, and legalities. Ethical Challenges Ethical challenges that arise as an advocator and a mediator simultaneously include the ethical responsibility of acting with integrity and honesty (University of Phoenix, 2011).
My research paper will argue that the exclusionary rule needs to be changed and although it is a right, federal and certain state laws should not be included with the exclusionary rule. While I do believe the exclusionary rule act provides a basic human protection on rights that is significant in our legal system it needs to be changed. Four major cases have shown the power of the exclusionary act: Weeks v. United States in 1914, Silverthorne Lumber Company v. United States in 1920, Wolf v. Colorado in 1949, and Mapp v. Ohio in 1961 and all have added to the interpretation and decision making on evidence in court cases. Fruit of the poisons tree doctrine in 1920 and the creation of the good faith clause in 1984 has created even more interpretation for the courts on whether evidence seized is valid to use in court or not. Despite these provisions of interpretation, however, it does have flaws within it and in certain instances evidence that is protected by the exclusionary rule should be included in obtaining a conviction in criminal proceedings.