Jackson, for Respondent. |Date: |2000-06-19 | |Docket: |AI 99-30-04430 | |Parallel citations: |[2000] 9 WWR 1; 6 BLR (3d) 193; 148 Man R (2d) 19 | Introduction: The issue in this appeal is whether or not the trial judge was in error in finding that the parties had negotiated a valid contract for the sale of shares in a privately held company. Facts and Background: Gendis Inc. owned 50% of the issued shares of a private company that produces oil in western Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta called Tundra Oil and Gas Ltd. On January 28, 1998, Albert Cohen, the chair of Gendis’s board of directors, approached George Richardson, the managing director of James Richardson & Sons, Limited, the parent company of Richardson, for the purpose of selling the Gendis shares in Tundra to Richardson. Albert Cohen and George Richardson met on two occasions early in 1998 and also exchanged telephone calls in an attempt to reach an agreement. In a meeting on February 12, 1998 Albert Cohen decided that the CEO of Gendis, Allan MacKenzie, will be the authorized Agent negotiating the sale on behalf of Gendis.
Unit 4 Assignment 1 Case Scenario Legal Encyclopedias Renee’ Grigg Unit 4 LS 311 Business Law July 29, 2014 Carrie has a set of legal encyclopedias for sale she makes an offer to Antonio to sell the legal encyclopedias to him for the price of $300.00. Antonio states that he needs to think about it but will let her know the following day. Norvell a bystander overhears the conversation making an offer to Carrie to purchase the legal encyclopedias on the spot for her asking price. Carrie excepts’ Norvell’s offer and gave the encyclopedias to Norvell, he gave her $ 300.00 which was the consideration in the contract, Carrie had a product for sale and Norvell had the $ 300.00 that made this a legal and binding contract, that was fully
Second, he negotiated an agreement with a sales representative to handle sales in the western part of the United States. Third, he initiated an advertising campaign, by means of direct mail and announcements in trade papers, stating that the winders would be ready for delivery on June 1 that year. Process of Mr Krause found the potential sources Mr. Krause’s preliminary survey indicated that four companies were interested in undertaking the work: Bullock Art; Webster, Inc., and Hershey Associates (the two concerns specializing in the production of technical manuals): Analysis of the four companies Mr Krause must analysis the four companies must could prepare approximately 180 illustrations and technical drawings and have the manual ready for the printer on the first of May Analysis of Webster, Inc, which was the largest art concern in the city, employing approximately 150 artists and book designers. The company had excellent facilities, including the latest art and layout equipment and its own photographic laboratories. The operations of the company appeared to be efficiently organized and well managed But Krause learned that approximately 80 percent of its business had been with one large manufacturer that had recently informed the
Ms. Mary Ford APEU Director of Human Resources sent a memo to Mr. Hector Fuentes, President, APEU Local No. 121 in which the main question/controversy responsible for the memo is whether or not the union should oppose the outsourcing proposal set forth by Governor Gloria Gainor. The issue set forth is that the Governor sent a letter on October 20, 2011 notifying the union that the state intends to outsource and privatize the information systems management function within the Department of Motor Vehicles. The conclusion set forth by Ms. Ford is that the APEU
Shanley Production Company, corporation in Texas, was the general partner and was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Shanley Corporation, parent company based in Delaware. James Spitzer and Leonard Lichter (plaintiffs) were limited partners. All profits generated from property owned by the partnership, which included oil and gas wells, were to be distributed in percentages to the limited partners. Neal McCabe, at the time, was chairman of the board for Shanley Corp and Shanley Production respectively. He was in charge of acquisitions of Shanley Corp and had the duty to identify companies to be acquired and the negotiation of such acquisitions.
Paper on “Land Tenure in Hawaii” In my opinion, the Mo’i is the most responsible for the failure of the Mahele. The idea of creating this series acts for the redistribution of land begins with the great debt Hawaii falls into with the sadlewood traders, caused by the Hawaiian King, Kamehamena II. In order to avoid Western invasion, the king decides to invite the Haole to create the Privy Council, a body that would advise him when making political decisions. This was the first step to turn Hawaii into a more western civilization. One of the first and most important decisions the king makes, evidently advised by the new council, is to allow the privatization of land.
Respostas do quiz de business law 2 * Question 4 0 out of 1.5 points | | | Acme, a Dover, Delaware company, is to send widgets to a customer in Elmira, New York, under a destination contract. The contract will read _______.Answer | | | | | Selected Answer: | F.A.S./Dover, Delaware | | | | | * Question 6 0 out of 1.5 points | | | Trader, a business located in Rutland, Vermont, is shipping goods from the Port of Boston to a customer in Oslo, Norway. The contract calls for Trader to deliver the goods and have them safely loaded on the ship, Lodestar. Trader’s liability ends when the goods are on the ship. The contract will read _______.Answer | | | | | Selected Answer: | F.A.S./Rutland, Vermont | | | | | * Question 1 0 out of 1.5 points | | | Anne bought an antique bracelet from a jeweler.
Unit 5 Assignment Kaplan University In the case of Ms. Charlize Theron vs watch maker Raymond Weil we are to discuss three items, how the contract between these two people was allegedly breached, what defenses may be available to the defendant, and what remedy may be available to the plaintiff. The first question I will address is how exactly the contract was breached. Mrs. Theron signed a contract with the watchmaker Mr. Weil stating that from October 2005 through December 2006 she would only wear Weil's high-end watches. But in fact she was wearing the competitions watches as well as Weil’s. Now this would be considered a breach but after reading the article several times it said she was not allowed to represent any other jewelry
The courts had to determine if the statements were sufficient to exercise long arm statute seeing that the fourteenth amendments allows personal jurisdiction. In the end the defendants appeal. Issue: Why did the defendants not appeal due to diversity of jurisdiction to have their case heard in a federal court? Decision: The Supreme Court of Idaho affirmed the decision of the trail
The defence of Mistake of Fact is sometimes allowed as a valid defence because, although the defendant has committed the actus reus o the offense, the defendant may honestly belive in a set of facts that would prevent him or hr from forming the mens rea required to constitute the crime. R v Adey, 2001 NFLd Facts/evidence: Mr. Adey bought a stolen satellite dish from a person he did not know at the Viking Mall located in St.Anthony. He purchased the dish for $15 and had it set up at his home. This satellite dish had originally been purchased by Mr. Todd Russell in St. John's. He paid $349 +tax for the dish.