Joint Commission Disadvantages

1876 Words8 Pages
The Joint Commission and Quality Control By: Kathy Ray HCA 375 Continuous Quality Monitoring & Accreditation Paula Arceneaux December 5, 2011 Health care today is one of the most debated topics among Americans today. Everyone has a different idea of what the health care system should consist of to become efficient enough for the American people both in quality and affordability. The United States ranks high on the devolved world scale as being the most expensive and one of the lowest in quality. There are many reason for high costs in the health care field most have pros and cons that not cause a domino effect on the quality of the healthcare provided. So where does America stand? What can be done do to help insure…show more content…
The USA Today statistic is only one of many statistics that have been reported of the years. To keep this number and others from rising, it is up to the organizations to step up and enforce quality control and assurance. There are several organizations that are involved in quality control and assurance, one of which is the Joint Commission. The Joint Commission has an extensive history dating back to 1910 Ernest Codman, M.D., proposes the “end result system of hospital standardization.” Under this system, a hospital would track every patient it treated long enough to determine whether the treatment was effective ( Joint Commission 2011). If these treatments failed then the hospital became responsible for finding out why the failure took place. In 1913 the American College of Surgeons was founded and then in 1917 the ACS helped bring in the minimum standards for hospitals. In 1918 the ACS began inspecting hospitals to see if they met these standards that were set into place. In 1918 the first manual was printed with these standards. In 1950 the standards stet into place by the ACS had help improve the care in more than 3,200…show more content…
called the Specifications Manual for National Hospital Inpatient Quality Measures. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals has continuously tried to emphasized the importance of improvement in the quality of care provided in hospitals. One way that the Joint commission has tried to stress the importance of quality improvement is to really stress the importance of the responsibility given to the medical and other professional staffs that provide, review and evaluate patient care. The government has assisted The Joint commission and other quality control organizations like it as best as they can. An example of this would be the The Healthcare Quality Improvement Act of 1986 was created and put in place to help protect the public from malpractice and mistreatment from physicians. The act is to not only protect the patients from mistreatment of rouge physicians but to also improve medical care all together by using efficient peer reviews to help insure the effectiveness of physicians. These reviews can also help keep incompetent physicians from moving from one state to the next. However pure the Act may seem, in some cases the physicians that are receiving the bad reports are not in the wrong.

More about Joint Commission Disadvantages

Open Document