Jane Bernstein's "A Victim Of Circumstance"

690 Words3 Pages
Murderers James Hamm and David Mumbaugh depicts different ways of paying their debt. Jane Bernstein’s view of understanding appropriate punishment for murder is altered when she encounters the different ways paying a debt and the influence of the Victim’s Bill of Rights. She suggests that there’s validation in allowing victims to play a role in the decision of a criminal’s release, yet they should not confer the power to determine one’s destiny. All too often, individuals who after being convicted of their crimes, served their sentences and are due for release, but are then subjected to the wrath of their victims and/or their relatives. At times, there are even attempts through the legal system to have their sentences reduced and released on “good behavior”. James Hamm, like any other murderer was sentenced for first degree murder and sent to prison. Unlike many offenders, James took a turn for the better. He accepted full responsibility in taking an innocent life, and as a result, made positive steps towards becoming a better person, perhaps both for himself and for society. While incarcerated, James registered in several courses that improve self worth as well as every work program the prison had to offer. He even earned a Bachelor’s degree with distinction. With such performances, James’ sentence was altered and he was paroled after serving seventeen years. Upon his release, James attended law school. He had somehow managed to look beyond his past and was determined to encompass a brighter future. To James, he had “paid his debt” to society and is now living his life as a new man. Many offenders that were sentenced to life at some point filed for several appeals to be released early on parole. Thus was the case of David Mumbaugh. David Mumbaugh, a seventeen year old teenager residing in Tempe Arizona was convicted for murdering a twenty year old

More about Jane Bernstein's "A Victim Of Circumstance"

Open Document