Jamestown Colony vs. Massachusetts Bay Colony

1155 Words5 Pages
Jamestown Colony vs. Massachusetts Bay Colony A man with a wife and two children had strong beliefs in being a Congregationalist and eventually came to the decision of migrating to the New World simply because of the new opportunities for his family and himself that he did not receive in England. In comparison to Jamestown, Massachusetts Bay is a much more efficient colony to settle in merely because he will be able to handle his religious matters as he pleases without the Stuart Monarchs interfering with their belief of a king having the authority to enforce religious conformity. Also, in New England, the environment was more family-friendly and they mostly earned immense profits by experiencing in shipbuilding and trade. Lastly, New England families lasted longer and stayed healthier than other colonies. New England, in general, was well-organized and sturdy in comparison to Jamestown’s swampy land and unequipped settlers. Immigrants who settled in the Chesapeake area seemed to have been little affected by religious motives. However, religion influenced many settlers in New England. Unlike Separatists, this Congregationalist man wanted to reform the Church of England rather than abolish it. He and other Congregationalists believed Charles I was more hostile to the Puritans than his father had been. Under his leadership, the Church of England attempted to suppress Puritan practices. Apprehensively, the Congregationalists were convinced that they will no longer be able to practice their religion freely in their homeland. They wanted to remain committed to reforming the Church of England but considered the thought that they can pursue that aim in America. John Winthrop, the governor of the Massachusetts Bay Company, organized the initial migration of the Puritans, transferring the Massachusetts Bay Company headquarters to New England where they settled in the
Open Document