"How To Mark A Book" Interpretative Essay

782 Words4 Pages
Interpretative Essay According, to Mortimer J. Adler in “How to Mark a Book” just reading a book is not enough. An avid reader like myself find that the use of marking books has no real use in this age of electronics. Using the nonfiction forms of personal experience, personal reflection and personal opinion Alder explains how a book should be marked to make it a part of the reader, and the reader a true book owner. Adler expresses his personal opinion in a variety of ways. Contending that marking up a book is not an act of mutilation but of love, Adler expresses this is to be a true book owner. There are no facts to support this opinion. When he states that there are three kinds of book owners, this also his personal opinion, and not based on any real data. His personal opinion that marking a book keeps you awake also is not based on any fact. Having one person state they are too tired to read, when they find themselves doodling instead of writing notes is not a proven fact; just one person’s observation of them self. Adler uses his personal experience as fact when in truth they are just his experiences. By marking a book Adler believes he is actively reading, and making the book an extension of himself. This again is just Adler’s personal experience with reading, and has not been proven in any scientific way. Also writing his own index is his way of experiencing a further understanding of the book. Not everyone needs to do this to understand what they have read. In his experience if a book is to be truly own it must be tattered, have turned down page corners, and have writing in between the lines, down the margins wherever there is space to write or take notes. Adler’s personal experience is that by writing notes in the margins enabled him to remember thoughts, making sentences, and words clearer; therefore preserving them in his memory. My experience is that
Open Document