Of the Tsars I believe that Alexander II, called the ‘Tsar Liberator’, caused the biggest change over the period. I believe he was the only Tsar that wanted to reform. I believe Alexander II’s reforms affected the most people living in Russia. In response to the defeat in the Crimean War the Tsar where the majority of Russians saw themselves in higher regard than was translated in the outcome training was modernised and facilities were improved. The effect of this caused military life to have become a lot safer and potentially more profitable when fighting.
He wanted complete control and he got it .He rose to power at the age of 3 when his father died and at 16, he crowned himself as the Czar of Russia. He expand Russia from being the land around Moscow into a large nation with similar European holdings that it has today ,create a standing army , get rid of the last opponents in the immediate area, the Khanates of Kazan and Astrakhan , and Begin the rapid expansion into Siberia. Overcame trade problems early in his reign and fought a long war towards the end of his reign which devastated the russian economy. Of course he made a army and gave Russia the power of war but as for anything else, he did nothing to help the economy at the time. This is William and Mary , a joint reign.
Alexander the Great Alexander III was considered a great because of his actions and many different accomplishments. As the King of Macedonia he did many great things. He attempted to conquer the entire world. He would have done it too but he had a quick unfortunate death. After his death the downfall of the empire he was building for 10 years fell.
He would win battles against weaker forces, but win he did, establishing a foothold on what would become the city of St. Petersburg. 12 Since there was no way Peter could send the southern fleet all the way around Europe or Asia to the Baltic, Peter again had an entire navy constructed from scratch and they would participate in naval as well as amphibious landings against the Swedes. 13 Throw in internal rebellion, external armies invading and bad choices by the Swedish military he and his forces finally owthe Great Northern War was concluded in terms favorable to Russia. Not content however,Peter would mobilize his forces (again) in an attempt to take on the Turks and would fail. To the rest of the European powers however, for the first time Great Britain and France would take notice of the power and potential of a rising Russia.
After World War One the whites (soviets) went to war with the reds (Bolsheviks and followers) and the civil war started. The reds eventually won the civil war but not because that they had more people than the whites but because the reds army was much more organised than the whites. In the end 10 million people died which was a shocking number since Lenin said there would be peace and no more war. Vladimir Lenin along with the Bolsheviks eventual turned Russia turned into a communist country.meaning that farmland was shared out between the farmers and the factories where given to the workers. All banks where natolinezed, meaning that the economy was run by the national council.
The Mongolian society has been wrongly conveyed through the eyes of the present world due to a series of what seems to be a perfect storm. But in fact if you look at the Mongol society's military prestige, Commercial excellence, and astounding overall societal moral then the question of how barbaric were the Mongols will be clear. The Mongols are best known for their amazing Military, which is where the misconception of barbarism came from. The Mongol society came to be truly known through arguably the best Military leader the world has ever seen, Genghis Khan. He conquered Nearly 5 Million square miles of land in his 65 year Lifespan (doc A).
How would you evaluate Astor in terms if his motive, his managerial ability and his ethics? What lesson does his career teach us about the relationship between virtue and success? Astor from the age of 15 was a very motivated and determined boy with one goal in mind ~ to voyage to the new world and exceed on a massive scale. On his voyage, he learned a new trade which gave him the skills for the occupation that would soon make him the riches man in America. He was self motivated by profits to become the largest and only American Fur company, owning 99.9% of the stock and going out of his way to crush rivals, monopolizing the industry.
Nicholas II ruled from 1894 until his abdication on 15 March 1917. His reign saw Imperial Russia go from being one of the foremost great powers of the world to economic and military collapse. Critics nicknamed him Bloody Nicholas because of the Khodynka Tragedy, Bloody Sunday, the anti-Semitic pogroms, his execution of political opponents, and his pursuit of military campaigns on a hitherto unprecedented scale. | 2. Why that person is historically important.
The Rise and Decline of the Mongol Empire Temujin, better known as Genghis Khan, became a universal ruler in 1206 he then led the Nomadic people to victory several times. The Mongols ended up creating a great empire that spread from the Yellow Sea to Baghdad. The reasons for their success were based on strategy, tactics, operations, logistics and unconventional warfare. The decline of the Mongols could be attributed to its size and aristocracy. The Mongols had several advantages over its enemies.
"(iranvision.com) Darius's words affected many people and it proved how great he was. In his life he achieved alot by his reforms, Darius was from a noble family and he went through many wars because he wanted more powers and lands, after his death Persian Empire was an empire that couldn't be compared to any other empires. Himself knew about all his talent so he curved on one of the biggest stone " My body is strong. As a fighter of battles I am a good fighter of battles. [...] I am skilled both in hands and in feet.