Guns Germs And Steel Critical Analysis

737 Words3 Pages
Jared Diamond opened the curtains to his book Guns, Germs, and Steel with a conversation between himself and Yali, a New Guinean politician. Yali’s posed a question, asking: “Why is that you white people developed much cargo and brought it to New Guinea, but we black people had little cargo of our own?” (pg. 14), or in other words, how did Europe, a continent that takes up less than 7% of the world’s total land area, come to dominate the world. In the book ‘Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates to Human Societies’, the author Jared Diamond attempts to answer Yali’s question by exploring the different factors that led up to Europe’s domination of the world. Throughout his book, Diamond was searching for the causes of inequality instead of trying to prove it is reasonable with racial justifications, thus he was explaining inequality and not trying to justify it. The word justify often has…show more content…
In his Epilogue, Diamond states that: “…if the populations of Aboriginal Australia and Eurasia could be been interchanged during the Late Pleistocene, the original Aboriginal Australians would now be the ones occupying most of the Americas and Australia, as well as Eurasia…” (pg. 405) Through this quote, Diamond is clearly trying to rebut against the racial justification of the ones that assumed so. As Jared Diamond progressed through the explanations and origins of inequality, his conclusion was, as stated in the book’s Epilogue: “the striking differences between the long-term histories of peoples of the different continents have been due not to innate differences in the peoples themselves but to differences in their environments.” (pg. 305) Diamond disproves the arguments of the ones that try to justify inequality by explaining through his book that genetically inherited traits of the Eurasian natural selection does not vary the speed of development through different races of

More about Guns Germs And Steel Critical Analysis

Open Document