George Mcclellan A Critical Analysis

2444 Words10 Pages
General George B. McClellan: A Critical Analysis There is perhaps no other military leader connected with the American Civil War that created so much interest and caused so much controversy as George B. McClellan. His ability to organize and build a military was among the best in history. However, his ability to lead and fight has always been seriously questioned. Because his legacy was so widespread, we will look at and compare the timeframe from his appointment to General of the Army of the Potomac/General in Chief to his relief from command by President Lincoln. The authors we will compare are; James McPherson, Stuart Sifakis, and Ethan S. Rafuse. We will analyze how they viewed McClellan on the issues listed below: 1. James McPherson’s view of McClellan as planner and as a leader. 2. Stuart Sifakis’ view of McClellan’s organizational, training, and leadership skills. 3. Ethan Rafuse’s view of McClellan as an organizer and leader, with respect to the political climate of that era. We will consider the sources these authors used in order to form their analysis of McClellan’s career. The sources they used help create their opinion. This critical analysis will focus on these three issues. James McPherson’s view of McClellan as a planner and leader General George B. McClellan was one of the most intriguing figures of the U.S. Civil War. His hand print on the war was felt throughout its duration. James McPherson also saw the complexity of McClellan and gave both a positive and negative view of his legacy. McPherson agreed with most scholars that General McClellan’s planning and training skills were some of the best of that era. When McClellan took over the Army of the Potomac from McDowell in July 1861, he found an undisciplined, untrained unit. McClellan wrote:” I found no Army to

More about George Mcclellan A Critical Analysis

Open Document