Frankenstein & Blade Runner Comparative Study

865 Words4 Pages
English Speech Transcript “The notion of responsibility is the critical connection between Frankenstein and Blade Runner” Responsibility is a multi-dimensional concept that unifies an individual with their inner landscape and their external world. There are critical connections between Mary Shelley's 'Frankenstein' and Ridley Scott's 'Blade Runner' based around the notion of responsibility and both composers aim to convey its dynamic process. They embody a variety of elements of responsibility that enable us to unlock doors to which we can examine their similarities. Ambition and fallibility, isolation, and death and immortality form a parallelism between the texts. Both composers exhibit that genuine responsibility is acquired only after the traumatic experiences of paranoia and loss, overturning the underlying presumption that it is universal and easily recognised. Ambition and fallibility are characteristics that both Victor Frankenstein and Eldon Tyrell possess. These concepts are deeply flawed because they form ominous and dystopic worlds. Victor has an obsessive thirst for knowledge and destructive ambition. As he is a product of the Romantic value of egocentrism; he is blind to the consequences of his overwhelming desire to be omnipotent and is driven to discover the “secret of life”. To Victor, this secret is a metaphor for life yet ironically, it is his lack of communication that results in the immoral execution of Justine. Shelley echoes his blindness through the symbolism of light as enlightenment, stating that this ‘secret’ will bring a “torrent of light into our dark world” (page 55). Similarly, the recurring motifs of eyes in Blade Runner are symbolic of knowledge and perception. In the opening scenes, the extreme close-up of the eyes with blazing fires foreshadows the concept of dangerous knowledge. This juxtaposition connects the notion of
Open Document