Fixed Line vs Cellular Debate

595 Words3 Pages
Data on Fixed Line vs. Cellular Debate Good news is improved data communications lead to faster transfer of information within businesses and between partners and customers. For example, sales people can remotely check stock levels and prices whilst on sales calls. Because wireless technology enables the user to communicate while on the move, you are rarely out of touch - you don't need extra cables or adaptors to access office networks. Office-based wireless workers can be networked without sitting at dedicated computers, and can continue to do productive work while away from the office. This can lead to new styles of working, such as home working or direct access to corporate data while on customer sites. Wireless networks can be easier and cheaper to install, especially in listed buildings or where the landlord will not permit the installation of cables. The bad news is wireless transmission is more vulnerable to attack by unauthorized users, so particular attention has to be paid to security. You may suffer interference if others in the same building also use wireless technology or where other sources of radio signals are present. This could lead to poor communication or, in extreme cases, loss of wireless communication altogether. In some buildings getting consistent coverage can be difficult, leading to 'black spots' where no signal is available. For example, in structures built using steel reinforcing materials, you may find it difficult to pick up the radio frequencies used. Wireless transmission can be slower and less efficient than 'wired' networks. In larger wireless networks the 'backbone' network will usually be wired rather than wireless. Good news is the most important and distinct advantage of having a landline phone is that there is a stable network connection. The signal never drops and the voice is clear too. They do not require any

More about Fixed Line vs Cellular Debate

Open Document